Motoko Kusanagi ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Motoko Kusanagi

Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex

in Cartoon and Animation

Motoko Kusanagi ~ Sakinorva Databank

Motoko Kusanagi

Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex

Cartoon and Animation

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISTP 4

INTJ 1

5w6 3

5w4 1

sp/so 1

LSI 1

LIE 1

VLFE 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 20

7

5

4

1

1

2

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	Blank 2018/06/10 (Sun) 13:28:32 #1162
	I'm just typing her using IDRlabs definitions on functions. And using that, she is an ISTP. She is not a Te user, she doesn't do things for the sake of efficiency nor imposing order, nor is long range planner. So INTJ is discarded. She adapts to the current situation and chooses the best tactical straightforward method (Ti + Se) to achieve her mission. Pretty much like Solid Snake or James Bond.

Editing post #1162 by Blank <p>I'm just typing her using IDRlabs definitions on functions. And using that, she is an ISTP. She is not a Te user, she doesn't do things for the sake of efficiency nor imposing order, nor is long range planner. So INTJ is discarded. She adapts to the current situation and chooses the best tactical straightforward method (Ti + Se) to achieve her mission. Pretty much like Solid Snake or James Bond.</p>
Replying to post #1162 by Blank

edza ENTJ 8w7 SLE 2018/06/10 (Sun) 11:43:13 #1161
If you're typing her using Jung's types she'd be more of an Extraverted Thinking type, which also ties into why I chose LIE. Jung's Introverted Thinking type leans J and strongly N anyway, and making the case that she fit Jung's Ti would be more like saying she's likely to be INTJ. However, she has a Thinking (Jungian) preference without actually being Judging (MBTI). That's not the norm but what she is makes it a lot more likely.

Editing post #1161 by edza <p>If you're typing her using Jung's types she'd be more of an Extraverted Thinking type, which also ties into why I chose LIE. Jung's Introverted Thinking type leans J and strongly N anyway, and making the case that she fit Jung's Ti would be more like saying she's likely to be INTJ. However, she has a Thinking (Jungian) preference without actually being Judging (MBTI). That's not the norm but what she is makes it a lot more likely. </p>
Replying to post #1161 by edza

	Blank 2018/06/10 (Sun) 02:04:02 #1152
	My understanding of functions come mostly from IDRlabs or derivated sources. Here they mention Ti: https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.idrlabs.com/articles/2013/04/why-te-is-inductive-and-ti-is-deductive/amp/ "External facts are not the aim and origin of [Ti]. … [Ti] formulates questions and creates theories, it opens up new prospects and insights, but with regard to facts its attitude is one of reserve. They are all very well as illustrative examples, but they must not be allowed to predominate. Facts are collected as evidence for a theory, never for their own sake. If ever this happens, it is merely a concession to the extraverted style.” (Psychological Types §628)

Editing post #1152 by Blank <p>My understanding of functions come mostly from IDRlabs or derivated sources.</p> <p>Here they mention Ti: https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.idrlabs.com/articles/2013/04/why-te-is-inductive-and-ti-is-deductive/amp/</p> <p>"External facts are not the aim and origin of [Ti]. … [Ti] formulates questions and creates theories, it opens up new prospects and insights, but with regard to facts its attitude is one of reserve. They are all very well as illustrative examples, but they must not be allowed to predominate. <strong>Facts are collected as evidence for a theory, never for their own sake. If ever this happens, it is merely a concession to the</strong> <strong>extraverted style.”</strong> <em>(Psychological Types §628)</em></p> <p><em></em></p> <p> </p> <p><em></em></p> <p> </p>
Replying to post #1152 by Blank

date	username	vote
23/02/05 10:05	GIJOEBusta Cap	ISTP
21/01/18 20:16	tch	INT
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	INTP
18/06/19 05:30	EON	xNTx
18/06/10 01:11	Khel	INTJ
18/06/09 01:38	edza	INTP

date	username	vote
23/02/05 10:05	GIJOEBusta Cap	ISTP
21/01/18 20:16	tch	ISTP
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	INTJ
18/06/26 02:27	edza	ISTP
18/06/08 01:24	Blank	ISTP

date	username	vote
23/02/05 10:05	GIJOEBusta Cap	5w6
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	5w6
18/06/09 01:44	edza	5w6

date	username	vote
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	sp/so

date	username	vote
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	584

date	username	vote
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	LSI
18/06/09 01:39	edza	LIE

date	username	vote
21/01/18 16:14	Jacobus	VLFE