Extroverted Sensing (Se) ~ Sakinorva Databank

Extroverted Sensing (Se)

MBTI functions

Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ESFP 3

ESTP 1

7w8 5

8wb 2

sx/so 3

sx/sp 1

so/sx 1

SLI 4

ESE 2

SEE 1

FELV 1

FVLE 1

total votes 34

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/09/26 (Wed) 17:56:50 #3348
	Ironically, Se tends to be described in a way that goes more N than S by default (it's really just EP) when it's about having an openness to new ideas (new experiences) unless they either specifically mention thinking in a way where "this is what it is without additional processing" overtakes the idea of being comfortable with unknown or new experiences or if they emphasize the idea of being hopelessly present-attuned and having quick reflexes and whatnot, which people actually like to discredit in the first place to avoid "stereotypical" thinking where just because someone has quick reflexes doesn't make them an Se user despite it being such a hilariously futile attempt to add depth to the theory by distinguishing people who exhibit the same traits using analysis that magically defers to "cognition" and the reason why the brain works the way it does while having absolutely zero clue why to begin with, edging into creating archetypes defining the types and acknowledging that there is a "straightforward" way to go about typing people based on ingrained stereotypes that simply cannot be true because of the need to create another layer right over it. It's like thinking of the "stereotype" and working against it rather than coming up with a way of typing that isn't affected by the stereotype in the first place (think anti- vs. non-). And by the way, there is a terrible paradox in the scenario where a person taking in the world "without additional processing" would be chasing after new and exciting experiences (assuming it's exciting because it's a new experience) as a result of them anticipating that something exciting would be something new, which goes against the idea of having no perception bias of an event in the first place i.e. a person who truly took the world in without additional processing wouldn't be actively trying out new experiences because they're only focused on living the present without thinking any further about what they wish to experience. And as a side note: I've noticed Se in ESFP tends to be described more in a 7w6 kind of way where entertaining others and chasing new things takes precedence while the Se in ESTP takes on that duhhh I only think about the present and what's real attitude. I wouldn't vote on this entry just because of distinctions like that but it might avg. out to something like EP > N > F in the end.

Editing post #3348 by strawberry crisis <p>Ironically, Se tends to be described in a way that goes more N than S by default (it's really just EP) when it's about having an openness to new ideas (new experiences) unless they either specifically mention thinking in a way where "this is what it is without additional processing" overtakes the idea of being comfortable with <em>unknown </em>or <em>new</em> experiences or if they emphasize the idea of being hopelessly present-attuned and having quick reflexes and whatnot, which people actually like to discredit in the first place to avoid "stereotypical" thinking where <em>just because someone has quick reflexes doesn't make them an Se user</em> despite it being such a hilariously futile attempt to add depth to the theory by distinguishing people who exhibit the same traits using analysis that magically defers to "cognition" and the reason why the brain works the way it does while having absolutely zero clue why to begin with, edging into creating archetypes defining the types and acknowledging that there is a "straightforward" way to go about typing people based on ingrained stereotypes that simply cannot be true because of the need to create another layer right over it. It's like thinking of the "stereotype" and working against it rather than coming up with a way of typing that isn't affected by the stereotype in the first place (think anti- vs. non-). And by the way, there is a terrible paradox in the scenario where a person taking in the world "without additional processing" would be chasing after new and exciting experiences (assuming it's exciting because it's a new experience) as a result of them anticipating that something exciting would be something new, which goes against the idea of having no perception bias of an event in the first place i.e. a person who truly took the world in without additional processing wouldn't be actively trying out new experiences because they're only focused on living the present without thinking any further about what they wish to experience.<br><br> And as a side note: I've noticed Se in ESFP tends to be described more in a 7w6 kind of way where entertaining others and chasing new things takes precedence while the Se in ESTP takes on that duhhh I only think about the present and what's real attitude. I wouldn't vote on this entry just because of distinctions like that but it might avg. out to something like EP > N > F in the end.</p>
Replying to post #3348 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
20/12/20 00:47	LadyX	ESFP
20/12/19 12:45	Freaky_sage	ESFP
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	ESFP
18/12/10 16:14	tch	ESFP
21/08/20 14:02	Tman	ESxP

date	username	vote
22/04/08 03:28	Woll Smoth	ESTP
21/08/20 14:01	Tman	ESFP
20/12/19 12:45	Freaky_sage	ESFP
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	ESFP

date	username	vote
22/04/08 03:28	Woll Smoth	7w8
20/12/20 00:47	LadyX	8wb
20/12/19 12:45	Freaky_sage	7w8
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	7w8
19/01/08 11:54	Taco110	7w8
21/01/28 12:36	Tman	8wb

date	username	vote
20/12/20 00:47	LadyX	so/sx
20/12/19 12:45	Freaky_sage	sx/so
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	sx/so
21/08/20 14:00	Tman	sx/sp

date	username	vote
20/12/20 00:47	LadyX	827
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	782
19/01/08 11:55	Taco110	783
18/12/09 21:49	tman	873

date	username	vote
23/06/15 00:38	Woll Smoth	SLI
20/12/19 12:45	Freaky_sage	ESE
20/07/06 17:11	Diobono	SLI
20/07/06 13:56	Thyssen	SEE
19/10/01 19:43	Tman	SLI
18/09/29 11:43	fg	ESE

date	username	vote
21/01/28 12:34	Tman	FVLE
20/07/07 03:52	Diobono	FELV

	switchblades INFP delete 2018/09/26 (Wed) 20:47:41 #3353
	Whoever voted SLI is a genius btw, SLI is exactly MBTI Se lmao

Editing post #3353 by switchblades <p>Whoever voted SLI is a genius btw, SLI is exactly MBTI Se lmao</p>
Replying to post #3353 by switchblades