Iconoclasm ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Iconoclasm

Psychological Strategy

in Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

Iconoclasm ~ Sakinorva Databank

Iconoclasm

Psychological Strategy

Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

5w4 2

cp6w5 1

sx/sp 1

so/sx 1

ILE 1

VLEF 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 11

3

3

2

2

1

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2020/04/05 (Sun) 15:35:42 #7874
	The original incolasts destroyed Icons, not out of hatred of the holy, but out of an (admittedly misplaced) respect for the holy, it came out of the old testament comdanets that "though shalt not create graven images." Even when this instic is at it's worst, when it is amungst the percuters of other religions, you still find at least a pretenns of respect for the holyness of there own religoion.

Editing post #7874 by Tman <p>The original incolasts destroyed Icons, not out of hatred of the holy, but out of an (admittedly misplaced) respect for the holy, it came out of the old testament comdanets that "though shalt not create graven images." Even when this instic is at it's worst, when it is amungst the percuters of other religions, you still find at least a pretenns of respect for the holyness of there own religoion.</p>
Replying to post #7874 by Tman

	Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE 2020/04/05 (Sun) 15:28:50 #7873
	I can understand that line of reasoning but I'm unable to not take the original, literal meaning. The Iconoclasts were influenced by the successes of the Muslims to destroy religious art and iconography in an attempt to win back the favor of God. They weren't at all 5ish or 4ish in ideology, they were a narrow-minded, superstitious group. Regarding the Taliban's destruction of the Buddhas, they weren't acting purely out of hatred for iconography. Groups opposed to them were using tourist revenue and NGO funds for their own military funding. So the exact reason for literal iconoclasm cany vary (the Soviets and the Maoists also engaged in it), but it's never out of a desire to create something new. It's always out of a desire to destroy something old and venerable. cp6 makes sense to me.

Editing post #7873 by Jacobus <p>I can understand that line of reasoning but I'm unable to not take the original, literal meaning. The Iconoclasts were influenced by the successes of the Muslims to destroy religious art and iconography in an attempt to win back the favor of God. They weren't at all 5ish or 4ish in ideology, they were a narrow-minded, superstitious group.</p> <p>Regarding the Taliban's destruction of the Buddhas, they weren't acting purely out of hatred for iconography. Groups opposed to them were using tourist revenue and NGO funds for their own military funding. So the exact reason for literal iconoclasm cany vary (the Soviets and the Maoists also engaged in it), but it's never out of a desire to create something new. It's always out of a desire to destroy something old and venerable.</p> <p>cp6 makes sense to me.</p>
Replying to post #7873 by Jacobus

	LadyX intp 5 2020/04/05 (Sun) 14:51:22 #7872
	My original cp6w7 vote was for the physical destroyers of icons, including neo-cons who catalyzed the latest round of ancient site defacing. But I could see tmans point of view with a 5w4 vote for those who reject traditional focal points and invent new iconology - a symbolic rather than historical group. Jacobus - what would your vote be?

Editing post #7872 by LadyX <p>My original cp6w7 vote was for the physical destroyers of icons, including neo-cons who catalyzed the latest round of ancient site defacing. </p> <p>But I could see tmans point of view with a 5w4 vote for those who reject traditional focal points and invent new iconology - a symbolic rather than historical group.</p> <p>Jacobus - what would your vote be?</p>
Replying to post #7872 by LadyX

date	username	vote
20/04/05 15:29	Jacobus	ESTJ
20/04/04 14:03	Tman	NTJ
20/04/05 02:50	LadyX	INTP

date	username	vote
20/04/05 15:29	Jacobus	cp6w5
20/04/04 14:00	Tman	5w4
20/04/05 02:50	LadyX	5w4

date	username	vote
20/04/04 14:00	Tman	so/sx
20/04/05 02:50	LadyX	sx/sp

date	username	vote
20/04/04 14:00	Tman	584
20/04/04 13:46	LadyX	683

date	username	vote
20/04/04 14:02	Tman	ILE

date	username	vote
20/04/04 14:02	Tman	VLEF