The Sakinorva Databank
home index activity
random rules donate

Radical Feminism

Philosophy

in Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

Radical Feminism ~ Sakinorva Databank

Radical Feminism


Philosophy

ei
ns
ft
pj
functionenneavariantsociopsyche
cp6w5 4
6w5 1
8w7 1
so/sx 1
sx/so 1
sx/sp 1
IEE 1
VELF 1
ELVF 1
234 567 891
h
e
x
a
c
o

total votes 16

4

6

3

2

1

2

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold**bold**
italic*italic*
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}
You may not modify this entry's picture.
This comment has been deleted.

Flower-like

INFP

4

2020/11/13 (Fri) 08:23:01

#8546

And I have an inferiority complex when it comes to this website, I have imagined that it's members are the most rigorous intellectuals, as though I have fell through the ceiling of a Solvay conference and everything I do or say will be mercilessly ridiculed from the quintessential beginning, this for some reason causes me to post the silly things I know I will regret and avoid posting the things that may actually be productive.

Editing post #8546 by Flower-like

Replying to post #8546 by Flower-like

Flower-like

INFP

4

2020/11/10 (Tue) 20:39:41

#8537


It is fine, the thing that I don't have is knowledge.

Editing post #8537 by Flower-like

Replying to post #8537 by Flower-like

Tman

INTP

5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp

ILI

2020/11/04 (Wed) 11:05:59

#8533

Stop putting yourself down like that. You have just as much a right to your opinion as anyone else.

Editing post #8533 by Tman

Replying to post #8533 by Tman

Flower-like

INFP

4

2020/11/03 (Tue) 17:19:52

#8530

I'm the obnoxious one. The 7w8 vote was probably just voting it on the surface level, the type 7 fear of being deprived of opportunities and wanting more then the w8 fear of being controlled by men or the patriarchy etc., but whether that is feminism or radical feminism I don't know.

Editing post #8530 by Flower-like

Replying to post #8530 by Flower-like

Flower-like

INFP

4

2020/07/17 (Fri) 17:55:49

#8375

I don't find you to be obnoxious, nor the comment, far from it. I knew that I was probably wrong even when I voted, and may have ultimately deleted it. It is also because I now probably agree with the 6 votes, and also because I'm not very good at debates, and presenting thinking, especially on forums. So I'm sorry if it came across in that way.

Editing post #8375 by Flower-like

Replying to post #8375 by Flower-like

Tman

INTP

5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp

ILI

2020/07/17 (Fri) 16:23:57

#8374


Flower-Like, the fact that you've deleted your post without commenting makes me concerned you didn't really want to debate, either because you think there's no point in debating me, or because you find me so obnoxious you would rather not engage. If this is the case, I apologize. Of course, it's just as easily imaginable that you didn't want to talk for reasons completely unrelated to my comment, but I wanted to apologize, because I could see how my comment would come off as rude.

Editing post #8374 by Tman

Replying to post #8374 by Tman

Tman

INTP

5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp

ILI

2020/07/17 (Fri) 10:14:37

#8371

Flower-like. 7w8? Seriously?

Editing post #8371 by Tman

Replying to post #8371 by Tman

dateusernamevote
20/07/17 13:32Jacobus ENF
20/07/17 01:00tch ENF
20/07/16 23:20LadyX ESFJ
21/08/11 15:21Tman NFJ
dateusernamevote
22/08/30 12:45Woll Smoth cp6w5
20/11/13 13:24Flower-like 8w7
20/07/29 11:56bibliology cp6w5
20/07/17 13:32Jacobus 6w5
20/07/16 23:20LadyX cp6w5
21/03/02 21:10Tman cp6w5
dateusernamevote
21/08/11 15:22Tman sx/sp
20/11/13 14:00Flower-like sx/so
20/07/16 23:20LadyX so/sx
dateusernamevote
21/08/11 15:23Tman 648
20/07/16 23:20LadyX 612
dateusernamevote
20/07/20 21:57ethan IEE
dateusernamevote
20/07/17 13:32Jacobus ELVF
20/07/16 18:13Tman VELF