6w5 "The Paranoid Android" ~ Sakinorva Databank

6w5 "The Paranoid Android"

Alternative Enneagram

Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISTJ 2

6w5 3

cp6w5 1

sp/sx 2

sp/so 1

LII 1

LSI 1

LFEV 1

total votes 19

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/01/17 (Thu) 18:07:26 #4668
	You’re right, I should layer the votes instead of averaging them. If someone votes from the hard tritype dropdown, they submit that type while sending “null” values to the rest of the types (e.g. 125 -> submits 1 to 1, 2 and 5, but submits nothing to 3, 4, 6, etc). Because of the averaging system currently in place, sixteen hard 125 votes will be countered by someone voting any non-1 number to 1, 2, or 5 while voting 1 for 9, 4, or 6. I’ll see what I can do about it soon.

Editing post #4668 by strawberry crisis <p>You’re right, I should layer the votes instead of averaging them. If someone votes from the hard tritype dropdown, they submit that type while sending “null” values to the rest of the types (e.g. 125 -> submits 1 to 1, 2 and 5, but submits nothing to 3, 4, 6, etc). Because of the averaging system currently in place, sixteen hard 125 votes will be countered by someone voting any non-1 number to 1, 2, or 5 while voting 1 for 9, 4, or 6. I’ll see what I can do about it soon.</p>
Replying to post #4668 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
19/04/08 11:50	tman	LSI

date	username	vote
19/10/26 01:01	Tman	LFEV

	LadyX intp 5 2019/01/17 (Thu) 06:38:42 #4663
	There was one tritype vote for 693 I voted 694 Now it shows 539 (2 votes) - how is this averaging being done??

Editing post #4663 by LadyX <p>There was one tritype vote for 693</p> <p>I voted 694</p> <p>Now it shows 539 (2 votes) - how is this averaging being done??</p>
Replying to post #4663 by LadyX