Extraversion ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Extraversion

MBTI dichotomies

in Most Likelies

Extraversion ~ Sakinorva Databank

Extraversion

MBTI dichotomies

Most Likelies

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ESFP 3

ESTP 2

ESFJ 1

7w8 5

2w3 2

8w7 1

3w2 1

so/sx 7

SEE 4

ESE 2

VEFL 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 54

12

6

9

7

9

6

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	typometrics.tumblr INFJ 4w5 (459) sp/sx EII 2019/06/09 (Sun) 23:10:35 #6352
	If we're judging something as an expression, it'd be more substantial to be based on behavior. Thought process is naturally an internal process so everything valued is going to be personal and it's going to be based on your internal framework. That said, for thought process I see people-orientation as highly subjective and more based on relative experiences and personal processes, whereas system-orientation is much more objective or at least works towards something which is objective and in line with how the world is, much more impersonal. If this is about society then I would agree with everything you just said other than the ENFP bit. (semantics i suppose) Edit: Although, I actually could see Te being more extroverted than Fe in society with certain situations, it really depends on the situation.

Editing post #6352 by typometrics.tumblr <p>If we're judging something as an expression, it'd be more substantial to be based on behavior. Thought process is naturally an internal process so everything valued is going to be personal and it's going to be based on your internal framework. That said, for thought process I see people-orientation as highly subjective and more based on relative experiences and personal processes, whereas system-orientation is much more objective or at least works towards something which is objective and in line with how the world is, much more impersonal. If this is about society then I would agree with everything you just said other than the ENFP bit. (semantics i suppose) Edit: Although, I actually could see Te being more extroverted than Fe in society with certain situations, it really depends on the situation.</p>
Replying to post #6352 by typometrics.tumblr

Teru Mikami 2019/06/09 (Sun) 22:43:12 #6350
You're not talking functions but MBTI dichotomies in which extroversion is about social preference and "people" more than how much you interact with "the world", thinking as more extroverted than feeling then is plain wrong as feeling is entirely people-oriented while thinking is about systems of logic and fairness.. Even going with "the world around you" vs people you'd probably use an overall activity level as reference so you've got seeking novelty and jumping into activities for the sake of "external stimulation", people-orientation opposed to system-orientation, and a preference for the present moment, future possibilities and the making-and-breaking of plans rather than security and a desire to stick with your decisions.. you'd end up with ENFP with both definitions

Editing post #6350 by Teru Mikami <p>You're not talking functions but MBTI dichotomies in which extroversion is about social preference and "people" more than how much you interact with "the world", thinking as more extroverted than feeling then is plain wrong as feeling is entirely people-oriented while thinking is about systems of logic and fairness.. Even going with "the world around you" vs people you'd probably use an overall activity level as reference so you've got seeking novelty and jumping into activities for the sake of "external stimulation", people-orientation opposed to system-orientation, and a preference for the present moment, future possibilities and the making-and-breaking of plans rather than security and a desire to stick with your decisions.. you'd end up with ENFP with both definitions</p>
Replying to post #6350 by Teru Mikami

	typometrics.tumblr INFJ 4w5 (459) sp/sx EII 2019/06/09 (Sun) 22:20:59 #6348
	You're either taking information in or deciding what to do with that information. Dom-extraverted judging types are much more actively expressive of their will. Te-doms specifically are more managerial and driven to work their will into the world. They don't tend to procrastinate, they're highly decisive, and they basically think out loud. ESFP's get bogged way down by introverted feeling despite often wanting to live life to the fullest. There's a lot of them that get incredibly depressed.

Editing post #6348 by typometrics.tumblr <p>You're either taking information in or deciding what to do with that information. Dom-extraverted judging types are much more actively expressive of their will. Te-doms specifically are more managerial and driven to work their will into the world. They don't tend to procrastinate, they're highly decisive, and they basically think out loud. ESFP's get bogged way down by introverted feeling despite often wanting to live life to the fullest. There's a lot of them that get incredibly depressed.</p>
Replying to post #6348 by typometrics.tumblr

	typometrics.tumblr INFJ 4w5 (459) sp/sx EII 2019/06/09 (Sun) 21:05:06 #6342
	2's are ambiverts, not extraverts. 3, 7, and 8 would make the most sense. Type 1: Compliant and Competency Type 2: Compliant and Positive Outlook Type 3: Assertive and Competency Type 4: Withdrawn and Reactive Type 5: Withdrawn and Competency Type 6: Compliant and Reactive Type 7: Assertive and Positive Outlook Type 8: Assertive and Reactive Type 9: Withdrawn and Positive Outlook

Editing post #6342 by typometrics.tumblr <p>2's are ambiverts, not extraverts. 3, 7, and 8 would make the most sense.</p> <p>Type 1: Compliant and Competency<br /> Type 2: Compliant and Positive Outlook<br /> Type 3: Assertive and Competency<br /> Type 4: Withdrawn and Reactive<br /> Type 5: Withdrawn and Competency<br /> Type 6: Compliant and Reactive<br /> Type 7: Assertive and Positive Outlook<br /> Type 8: Assertive and Reactive<br /> Type 9: Withdrawn and Positive Outlook </p>
Replying to post #6342 by typometrics.tumblr

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/02/03 (Sun) 14:13:46 #5168
	I once made a big data set using statistics taken from the CPP (a.k.a. from the representative sample in the MBTI Manual): These translate to comparative likelihoods e.g. the likelihood of being an extravert as a judger is 0.946 times that of being an extravert as a perceiver. If we're using raw data that exists to make a judgement on this particular entry, voting anything that's ordered E > N > F > P should be fair. I'll vote 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.25 respectively, but my "true vote" would be something like 1.0, 0.15, 0.05, 0.05. The catch here is that these are all put together in a conglomerated mess, so true preferences might not really come out i.e. ENFP is an averaging out of everything for Feeling but it could be that ISJs had the highest ratio of feelers to thinkers. Luckily, I made data for that, too:

Editing post #5168 by strawberry crisis <p>I once made a big data set using statistics taken from the CPP (a.k.a. from the representative sample in the MBTI Manual):<br /> <img alt="" src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/289480570000506881/370797845818638336/Screen_Shot_2017-10-20_at_12.57.42_am.png" style="width:100%" /><br /> <br /> These translate to comparative likelihoods e.g. the likelihood of being an extravert as a judger is 0.946 times that of being an extravert as a perceiver. If we're using raw data that exists to make a judgement on this particular entry, voting anything that's ordered E > N > F > P should be fair. I'll vote 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.25 respectively, but my "true vote" would be something like 1.0, 0.15, 0.05, 0.05. <br><br> The catch here is that these are all put together in a conglomerated mess, so true preferences might not really come out i.e. ENFP is an averaging out of everything for Feeling but it could be that ISJs had the highest ratio of feelers to thinkers. Luckily, I made data for that, too: <br /> <img alt="" src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/342763828377026570/372029719203414027/Screen_Shot_2017-10-20_at_9.38.49_pm.png" style="width:100%" /> </p>
Replying to post #5168 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
20/12/19 18:55	Tman	ESFP
19/06/09 22:41	typometrics.tumblr	ESxx
19/06/10 04:36	ally	ENFP
19/05/21 03:32	INTJ-2698	ESFx
19/05/20 15:03	fg	ExFx
19/02/03 14:14	strawberry crisis	ENFP
19/06/09 22:16	Teru Mikami	ENFP
19/02/03 10:23	Taco110	ESFP
19/02/03 14:17	~snow~	ENFP
19/02/02 22:58	LadyX	ESTJ

date	username	vote
20/12/19 18:55	Tman	ESTP
19/06/09 19:50	ally	ESFP
19/05/21 03:32	INTJ-2698	ESFP
19/02/03 14:17	~snow~	ESFP
19/02/03 10:24	Taco110	ESFJ

date	username	vote
19/12/16 16:32	Thyssen	3w2
20/12/19 18:54	Tman	7w8
19/06/09 21:06	typometrics.tumblr	7w8
19/05/21 03:32	INTJ-2698	2w3
19/02/03 14:36	~snow~	7w8
19/02/03 12:34	Teru Mikami	2w3
19/02/03 10:24	Taco110	7w8
19/02/02 22:58	LadyX	8w7

date	username	vote
20/12/20 01:02	LadyX	so/sx
19/07/15 17:49	tman	so/sx
19/06/09 21:06	typometrics.tumblr	so/sx
19/06/09 19:50	ally	so/sx
19/02/03 10:25	Taco110	so/sx
19/02/03 10:16	Phantom	so/sx

date	username	vote
20/12/19 18:54	Tman	738
19/06/09 21:08	typometrics.tumblr	738
19/06/09 04:52	INTJ-2698	278
19/02/03 14:37	~snow~	738
19/02/03 12:36	Teru Mikami	268
19/02/03 10:25	Taco110	728
19/02/03 10:16	Phantom	378
19/02/02 22:57	LadyX	873

date	username	vote
20/12/19 18:57	Tman	SEE
19/05/21 03:32	INTJ-2698	SEE
19/05/20 15:03	fg	ESE
19/02/03 12:13	Teru Mikami	ESE
19/02/03 10:16	Phantom	SEE

date	username	vote
20/12/19 18:56	Tman	VEFL