~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

in

~ Sakinorva Databank

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISFJ 1

ENFJ 1

6w7 3

so/sx 1

sp/sx 1

sx/sp 1

sp/so 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes

4

2

3

4

4

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

bloomer ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/02/26 (Tue) 18:57:54 #5459
Superego: The superego develops over time, and it's the last to form. It contains all your standards of right and wrong. Contrary to popular belief, this isn't just the conscience. It contains the ego ideal and the conscience, and they're two sides of the same coin. The ego ideal is the summation of all positive behaviors. A good example might be "sharing" or "being helpful." The conscience is the flipside; it only comes into play with negative behaviors. It makes you feel bad when you do something against your ego ideal. (Keep this in mind when we talk about Type 6.)

Editing post #5459 by bloomer <div class="spoiler"> <div class="spoiler-title"> <div class="spoiler-toggle hide-icon"> </div> </div> <div class="spoiler-content"> <p><span style="color:purple"><strong>Superego:</strong></span> The superego develops over time, and it's the last to form. It contains all your standards of right and wrong. Contrary to popular belief, this isn't just the conscience. It contains the ego ideal and the conscience, and they're two sides of the same coin. The ego ideal is the summation of all positive behaviors. A good example might be "sharing" or "being helpful." The conscience is the flipside; it only comes into play with negative behaviors. It makes you feel bad when you do something against your ego ideal. (Keep this in mind when we talk about Type 6.)</p> </div> </div> <p> </p>
Replying to post #5459 by bloomer

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/02/26 (Tue) 18:48:23 #5457
	Cannot you just verify if the IPs are the same making so it is not possible for one to comment or vote or like twice unless that person uses a VPN which would already dodge a ban so it is not like it makes much difference? the only argument I could see made for this is that maybe someone uses this to do the opposite order and get IPs but from voting I do not think it is possible so there's that, or make it even better, make so the votes appear for the user as they were made but it does not appear for others, save it on cookies or something. People can't make new accounts unless they change their IP, so it's not really a measure I can usually counter that way. Anyway so consider what I have seen looking at MBTIbase wouldn't it just be better for you to create a literal copy of this website that goes into another database and that second page is purely oriented towards "most likely X" and similar crap that existed in MBTIbase and then solving the problem without needing to use that specific page you made because it does not allow voting and I think a relatively high amount of people who like to use this website would not enjoy commenting their votes and would prefer that but this is me assuming stuff. I could do that, yes. The audience for that type of thing isn't super big which is why I don't know if it's so necessary but it's not particularly difficult. I think you have the right idea -- I'll see what the best way to implement that is. Also remember to fix that thing I emailed you because I can still abuse it (not sure if you did the fix) and it is extremely easy to find out how to do it but I imagine that it is not happening at least right now and if you do not want to fix or do anything I said your call your website your rules and not like it is even that much of a problem as you can just constantly save backups which at most would make it annoying if the person constantly did it but then in that case you'd have already fixed it after like two times because it is rather simple. I'll take a look, thanks for the heads-up.

Editing post #5457 by strawberry crisis <p><em>Cannot you just verify if the IPs are the same making so it is not possible for one to comment or vote or like twice unless that person uses a VPN which would already dodge a ban so it is not like it makes much difference? the only argument I could see made for this is that maybe someone uses this to do the opposite order and get IPs but from voting I do not think it is possible so there's that, or make it even better, make so the votes appear for the user as they were made but it does not appear for others, save it on cookies or something.</em></p> <p>People can't make new accounts unless they change their IP, so it's not really a measure I can usually counter that way. <br /> </p> <p><em>Anyway so consider what I have seen looking at MBTIbase wouldn't it just be better for you to create a literal copy of this website that goes into another database and that second page is purely oriented towards "most likely X" and similar crap that existed in MBTIbase and then solving the problem without needing to use that specific page you made because it does not allow voting and I think a relatively high amount of people who like to use this website would not enjoy commenting their votes and would prefer that but this is me assuming stuff.</em></p> <p>I could do that, yes. The audience for that type of thing isn't super big which is why I don't know if it's so necessary but it's not particularly difficult. I think you have the right idea -- I'll see what the best way to implement that is.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Also remember to fix that thing I emailed you because I can still abuse it (not sure if you did the fix) and it is extremely easy to find out how to do it but I imagine that it is not happening at least right now and if you do not want to fix or do anything I said your call your website your rules and not like it is even that much of a problem as you can just constantly save backups which at most would make it annoying if the person constantly did it but then in that case you'd have already fixed it after like two times because it is rather simple.</em></p> <p>I'll take a look, thanks for the heads-up.</p>
Replying to post #5457 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/02/26 (Tue) 18:42:15 #5453
	Your rhetoric is amusing, but it seems like you're only trying to reach for the door. It is a big deal to me because vote manipulation kills the very purpose of this site, and it only exists for people like you, people who want to have a usable catalog of personalities that they can vote types on. Are you going to stop or should I just go ahead and ban your own remaining accounts?

Editing post #5453 by strawberry crisis <p>Your rhetoric is amusing, but it seems like you're only trying to reach for the door. It is a big deal to me because vote manipulation kills the very purpose of this site, and it only exists for people like you, people who want to have a usable catalog of personalities that they can vote types on. Are you going to stop or should I just go ahead and ban your own remaining accounts?</p>
Replying to post #5453 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/02/26 (Tue) 18:21:19 #5449
	Yikes, you liked your own comment with an alt that you created to vote on this entry a second time. Not only that, but it turns out you have nine accounts that you occasionally vote twice on entries with. I remember warning you in the past about voting on the same entry with more than one account, and it looks like you decided to run wild instead. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt?

Editing post #5449 by strawberry crisis <p>Yikes, you liked your own comment with an alt that you created to vote on this entry a second time. Not only that, but it turns out you have nine accounts that you occasionally vote twice on entries with. I remember warning you in the past about voting on the same entry with more than one account, and it looks like you decided to run wild instead. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt?</p>
Replying to post #5449 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/02/26 (Tue) 17:38:21 #5446
	I deleted a lot of similar entries because they fit into any of the following criteria: 1) too vague 2) too subjective 3) presumptuous/unproven premises 4) umbrella-like to a faulty extent 5) so barely type-related (because nothing is truly unrelated yadda yadda) that it isn't worth keeping as an entry I'd delete this entry too but I'll make an example out of it instead: this is barely type-related (is being worried about other people really an auto 6 thing now?), and too vague (why?). It's just pollution. People aren't going out of their way to search for "that friend that asks blablabla" in the search bar -- this is more of a mental exercise kind of thing that people have fun with, and I'd like to ask you to make discussions about these sorts of things rather than voting entries. They're more productive anyhow, since they often aren't best represented by the voting systems that are meant for specific people or specific traits. This does remind me, however, that there really isn't any reason for there to be a "most likelies" category at all and I'll either remove this sometime soon or just make them auto-discussions. I'd like to entertain this somewhere for the people who are so entertained by it, but this databank isn't really the best place for it. Maybe start something here?

Editing post #5446 by strawberry crisis <p>I deleted a lot of similar entries because they fit into any of the following criteria: 1) too vague 2) too subjective 3) presumptuous/unproven premises 4) umbrella-like to a faulty extent 5) so barely type-related (because nothing is truly unrelated yadda yadda) that it isn't worth keeping as an entry<br><br> I'd delete this entry too but I'll make an example out of it instead: this is barely type-related (is being worried about other people really an auto 6 thing now?), and too vague (why?). It's just pollution. People aren't going out of their way to search for "that friend that asks blablabla" in the search bar -- this is more of a mental exercise kind of thing that people have fun with, and I'd like to ask you to make discussions about these sorts of things rather than voting entries. They're more productive anyhow, since they often aren't best represented by the voting systems that are meant for specific people or specific traits.<br><br> This does remind me, however, that there really isn't any reason for there to be a "most likelies" category at all and I'll either remove this sometime soon or just make them auto-discussions. I'd like to entertain this somewhere for the people who are so entertained by it, but this databank isn't really the best place for it. <a href="http://i.sakinorva.net/spool?cid=1">Maybe start something here?</a></p>
Replying to post #5446 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
19/02/27 23:36	LadyX	ESFJ
19/02/27 22:28	tman	ISFJ
19/02/26 17:13	bloomer	ESFJ
19/02/26 17:16	Taco110	ESFJ

date	username	vote
19/02/27 22:28	tman	ISFJ

date	username	vote
19/02/27 23:37	LadyX	6w7
19/02/27 22:31	tman	6w7
19/02/26 17:13	bloomer	6w7

date	username	vote
19/02/27 23:37	LadyX	sx/sp
19/02/27 22:31	tman	sp/sx
19/02/26 17:15	Taco110	so/sx
19/02/26 17:13	bloomer	sp/so

date	username	vote
19/02/27 23:38	LadyX	628
19/02/27 22:32	tman	629
19/02/26 17:16	Taco110	268
19/02/26 17:13	bloomer	268