Kirumi Tojo ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Kirumi Tojo

Danganronpa V3: Killing Harmony

in Games

Kirumi Tojo ~ Sakinorva Databank

Kirumi Tojo

Danganronpa V3: Killing Harmony

Games

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISFJ 1

1w2 5

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 10

4

1

5

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/09/06 (Thu) 11:00:58 #3184
	Spoilers for Danganronpa v3 In Kirumi’s graduation event at the end of Love Across the Universe, her great principle is “selfless devotion,” and she elaborates upon this by explaining that she purges her own desires in favor of those of her master. But be careful about this when typing her. In Myers-Briggs, the difference between feeling and thinking has to do with an intention of making decisions either subjectively (and centered around care, warmth, harmony, and tact) or objectively (and centered around logic, reason and the truth). The thing with Kirumi is that she doesn’t intrinsically make decisions centered around emotional preservation or show any bias toward helping bolster “positive emotionality.” In principle, she merely acts in accordance with what her master bids of her. This is a non-subjective thought process that relies on adhering to a strict, linear, and logical principle: Kirumi ultimately should only care about fulfilling this value above everything else. If her master tells her to take care of his/her child as though Kirumi were the most devoted and loving mother in the world, Kirumi would obey. If her master tells her to commit a mass murder, Kirumi would obey. This is all assuming that Kirumi’s devotion is infallible. And it isn’t. The most self-driven we see Kirumi is when she changes who she perceives to be her master... which she decides from a utilitarian perspective. She does not hesitate to change her allegiances when she is finally given the opportunity to choose, justifying the decision with an idealistic belief in something removed from the immediate devotion she should feel for her current master. We learn that her connection to selfless devotion relies even further on a logical thought process... to the end that I can’t see her as anything but practically 100% T.

Editing post #3184 by strawberry crisis <p><strong>Spoilers for Danganronpa v3</strong><br><br> In Kirumi’s graduation event at the end of Love Across the Universe, her great principle is “selfless devotion,” and she elaborates upon this by explaining that she purges her own desires in favor of those of her master. But be careful about this when typing her. In Myers-Briggs, the difference between feeling and thinking has to do with an intention of making decisions either subjectively (and centered around care, warmth, harmony, and tact) or objectively (and centered around logic, reason and the truth). The thing with Kirumi is that she doesn’t intrinsically make decisions centered around emotional preservation or show any bias toward helping bolster “positive emotionality.” In principle, she merely acts in accordance with what her master bids of her. This is a non-subjective thought process that relies on adhering to a strict, linear, and logical principle: Kirumi ultimately should only care about fulfilling this value above everything else. If her master tells her to take care of his/her child as though Kirumi were the most devoted and loving mother in the world, Kirumi would obey. If her master tells her to commit a mass murder, Kirumi would obey. This is all assuming that Kirumi’s devotion is infallible.<br><br> And it isn’t. The most self-driven we see Kirumi is when she changes who she perceives to be her master... which she decides from a utilitarian perspective. She does not hesitate to change her allegiances when she is finally given the opportunity to choose, justifying the decision with an idealistic belief in something removed from the immediate devotion she should feel for her current master. We learn that her connection to selfless devotion relies even further on a logical thought process... to the end that I can’t see her as anything but practically 100% T.</p>
Replying to post #3184 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
22/04/07 07:44	GIJOEBusta Cap	ISTJ
18/09/07 01:48	~snow~	ISTJ
18/06/14 12:57	strawberry crisis	ISTJ
18/05/10 12:16	Stephen Hearts	ISTJ

date	username	vote
22/09/10 10:56	GIJOEBusta Cap	ISFJ

date	username	vote
22/04/07 10:02	Woll Smoth	1w2
22/04/07 07:44	GIJOEBusta Cap	1w2
18/05/11 02:13	~snow~	1w2
18/05/10 10:50	strawberry crisis	1w2
18/05/10 12:16	Stephen Hearts	1w2