The Sakinorva Databank
home index activity
random rules donate

T. S. Eliot

Poet

in Writing and Literature

T. S. Eliot ~ Sakinorva Databank

T. S. Eliot


Poet

ei
ns
ft
pj
functionenneavariantsociopsyche
INTJ 1
5w4 2
1w9 1
so/sp 1
sp/so 1
LII 1
LFEV 1
LVEF 1
234 567 891
h
e
x
a
c
o

total votes 12

4

1

3

2

1

1

2

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold**bold**
italic*italic*
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}
You may not modify this entry's picture.

Jacobus

INFJ

4w5

EIE

2020/11/23 (Mon) 21:33:03

#8573


I don't think you sincerely believe that. That's such a bad excuse.

Read over the definition again, if you really need to.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aleafan.org%2Fbooks%2Fsintaksislubvi%2Fsintaksislubvi90.html

Editing post #8573 by Jacobus

Replying to post #8573 by Jacobus

Tman

INTP

5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp

ILI

2020/11/23 (Mon) 19:17:29

#8572

Eliot defined himself largely by his national and racial heritage, rather then trying to figure out for himself who he was. V last can lead to egalitarianism, unless the V 4th finds something outside of himself which he can use to define himself.

Editing post #8572 by Tman

Replying to post #8572 by Tman

Flower-like

INFP

4

2020/11/23 (Mon) 05:46:01

#8571


Sex is generally to do with the combination of F and E I read somewhere, especially Dumas.

Editing post #8571 by Flower-like

Replying to post #8571 by Flower-like

Jacobus

INFJ

4w5

EIE

2020/11/23 (Mon) 00:09:05

#8570


F is explicitly tied to the material world: the body, money, food, etc. Eliot showed a lack of concern for such things.
And if you view Eliot as an elitist and bigot, why did you type him as 4V, which is even more humble and egalitarian to the point of having almost no sense of self?

Editing post #8570 by Jacobus

Replying to post #8570 by Jacobus

Tman

INTP

5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp

ILI

2020/11/22 (Sun) 22:36:57

#8568

Is F necessarily the same as Sex? It's always been a bit poorly defined, but I thought it was broader then that. An F first might be prone to over indulgence, but an F second is very often controlled and restrained in there physical indulgence. I thought it could just as easily be tied to being "grounded" in practical matters as it did sensory matters. I will tell you what a I don't see, which is V 2nd. V 2nd is known for there sense of egalitarianism, which sure doesn't fit with an elitist snob and Bigot like Eliot.

Editing post #8568 by Tman

Replying to post #8568 by Tman

Jacobus

INFJ

4w5

EIE

2020/11/22 (Sun) 20:29:47

#8567

tman can you please tell me how the fuck Eliot, one of the most sexless and ascetic poets in all of literature, could be 2F?

Editing post #8567 by Jacobus

Replying to post #8567 by Jacobus

dateusernamevote
20/11/07 19:46Tman INFJ
20/04/07 23:37zayeh INTJ
19/07/30 10:19Diobono INTJ
19/05/06 20:26Jacobus INTJ
dateusernamevote
20/11/16 16:10Tman INTJ
dateusernamevote
20/11/16 16:11Tman 1w9
19/07/30 10:19Diobono 5w4
19/05/06 20:26Jacobus 5w4
dateusernamevote
20/11/16 16:11Tman sp/so
19/05/06 20:26Jacobus so/sp
dateusernamevote
20/11/16 16:11Tman 164
dateusernamevote
19/05/06 20:26Jacobus LII
dateusernamevote
20/11/22 20:30Jacobus LVEF
20/11/16 16:12Tman LFEV