nicotineseries ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

nicotineseries

Sakinorva Databank

in Users

nicotineseries ~ Sakinorva Databank

nicotineseries

Sakinorva Databank

-

Users

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISFP 1

6w5 1

sp/so 1

SEI 1

LEFV 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 7

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/27 (Wed) 12:19:48 #10401
	And yeah actually, I just want to vote and provide the proof of Lewis Carroll MBTI type in here lol. Emh, well, why I feel uncomfortable voting for a science influncer or even like scientist influencers in here. For instance like Brian Greene, Bill Nye (the scientist ?) or even vsauce and et cetera because I'm embarrassed to be here with this one person. Duh, what should I do?

Editing post #10401 by nicotineseries And yeah actually, I just want to vote and provide the proof of Lewis Carroll MBTI type in here lol. Emh, well, why I feel uncomfortable voting for a science influncer or even like scientist influencers in here. For instance like Brian Greene, Bill Nye (the scientist ?) or even vsauce and et cetera because I'm embarrassed to be here with this one person. Duh, what should I do?
Replying to post #10401 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/26 (Tue) 11:42:08 #10396
	This is my copy pasted from my previous comment in here (trivia: I actually do to change my comment which I wrote a few days ago here, so): I wonder what, why and how about Prophet Muhammad too, but the thing is with the socionics, your typing EIE is that even different from the others than many Prophet I saw in here (I meant not all but "generally" in this website). The question is, if I would know if there's any wrong with Michael Pierce voting on that website like Personality Database even I don't know why and where did this person actually want to discovered with that site. I'm sorry if my words are wrong, now if you want tell me so you can inform that you can do. Fun fact: Michael Pierce is also actually do typing it on the Personality Database website btw. So what do you guys think about this?

Editing post #10396 by nicotineseries This is my copy pasted from my previous comment in here (trivia: I actually do to change my comment which I wrote a few days ago here, so): I wonder what, why and how about Prophet Muhammad too, but the thing is with the socionics, your typing EIE is that even different from the others than many Prophet I saw in here (I meant not all but "generally" in this website). The question is, if I would know if there's any wrong with Michael Pierce voting on that website like Personality Database even I don't know why and where did this person actually want to discovered with that site. I'm sorry if my words are wrong, now if you want tell me so you can inform that you can do. Fun fact: Michael Pierce is also actually do typing it on the Personality Database website btw. So what do you guys think about this?
Replying to post #10396 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/26 (Tue) 11:33:17 #10395
	Okay, everyone. Here I have a few questions. First, I do think that thing about Michael Pierce voting in the Personality Database was my good feeling, it was true. But yeah, what if I think too positively? But isn't true? Secondly, I might just transfer what he voted there to be fair here, and I believe that he has indeed done in-depth research and is not wrong about what he wrote, or what he did and what is the reason and purpose behind his typing and voting there? Third, actually, he seems to have replaced the voting here (on the Sakinorva website, we can vote, for example, like Korra Avatar, here Woll Smoth and I, the user voted for ESTP in here but in Personality Database, so someone with a user (Michael Pierce) on there chose his vote with ESFP IDR/Functions in that place, they have a different order with cognitive functions and difference in between cognitive axes). Well, that's where my confusion and the problem lies, right yeah that's what I meant by? So, now what would I do now I'm confused lol.

Editing post #10395 by nicotineseries Okay, everyone. Here I have a few questions. First, I do think that thing about Michael Pierce voting in the Personality Database was my good feeling, it was true. But yeah, what if I think too positively? But isn't true? Secondly, I might just transfer what he voted there to be fair here, and I believe that he has indeed done in-depth research and is not wrong about what he wrote, or what he did and what is the reason and purpose behind his typing and voting there? Third, actually, he seems to have replaced the voting here (on the Sakinorva website, we can vote, for example, like Korra Avatar, here Woll Smoth and I, the user voted for ESTP in here but in Personality Database, so someone with a user (Michael Pierce) on there chose his vote with ESFP IDR/Functions in that place, they have a different order with cognitive functions and difference in between cognitive axes). Well, that's where my confusion and the problem lies, right yeah that's what I meant by? So, now what would I do now I'm confused lol.
Replying to post #10395 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/18 (Mon) 05:51:24 #10338
	I meant not 2 years ago, I just noticed this website only when I unfortunately dive to much internet, I am not and never to have to purchase they own products, no I really don't have their books or something else like their membership. I'm actually not buying that either stuff even their own theories (i.e function axes, additional typing and etc).

Editing post #10338 by nicotineseries I meant not 2 years ago, I just noticed this website only when I unfortunately dive to much internet, I am not and never to have to purchase they own products, no I really don't have their books or something else like their membership. I'm actually not buying that either stuff even their own theories (i.e function axes, additional typing and etc).
Replying to post #10338 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/18 (Mon) 05:32:53 #10337
	So, my reply to this comment below is that I mean, in the past of their own website isn't that they do some of typing for this person that I have mentioned before in this comment? Or not? I recently had notice this website 2 years ago so now I don't know with progress of their own sites and stuff on that like right now, so that is my reason for my comment.

Editing post #10337 by nicotineseries So, my reply to this comment below is that I mean, in the past of their own website isn't that they do some of typing for this person that I have mentioned before in this comment? Or not? I recently had notice this website 2 years ago so now I don't know with progress of their own sites and stuff on that like right now, so that is my reason for my comment.
Replying to post #10337 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/18 (Mon) 00:10:33 #10334
	Guess, I'm asking for everyone, does anyone that it's still following IDRlabs-ian here? I think. I hope so, someone including active users in here that still used their typing method of IDRlabs, whatever the term of their own department is. My question is there, if I want to changing their own additional typing sections. Do I should did that for, doing that in here? Or do we do the rest, now I am want for and trying to re-evaluate their own typing celebrities section (on that for instance like (famous people of XXXX types of MBTI)) there if I want? What do you think?

Editing post #10334 by nicotineseries Guess, I'm asking for everyone, does anyone that it's still following IDRlabs-ian here? I think. I hope so, someone including active users in here that still used their typing method of IDRlabs, whatever the term of their own department is. My question is there, if I want to changing their own additional typing sections. Do I should did that for, doing that in here? Or do we do the rest, now I am want for and trying to re-evaluate their own typing celebrities section (on that for instance like (famous people of XXXX types of MBTI)) there if I want? What do you think?
Replying to post #10334 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/08 (Fri) 18:45:22 #10296
	Goodbye, I meant I probably will hiatus for a day's, not that much but I am have something interesting to do with my life :) Haha, you know I don't take this typology serious if it's not by your help? It's a granted to say thank you so deeply for your help and support and anything. So, I probably quitting my entire typology websites but not that many (but I'll be frequently visit that one typology sites like this). So keep on, prove your opinion and tell me if I'm wrong with what I did with my typing past ago. I really open to your suggestion and correction. Bye bye ⁠♡

Editing post #10296 by nicotineseries Goodbye, I meant I probably will hiatus for a day's, not that much but I am have something interesting to do with my life :) Haha, you know I don't take this typology serious if it's not by your help? It's a granted to say thank you so deeply for your help and support and anything. So, I probably quitting my entire typology websites but not that many (but I'll be frequently visit that one typology sites like this). So keep on, prove your opinion and tell me if I'm wrong with what I did with my typing past ago. I really open to your suggestion and correction. Bye bye ⁠♡
Replying to post #10296 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/03 (Sun) 05:11:33 #10268
	To those who are observing my user while voting the entry, right? I'm not JOKING okay, you've got that. I'm seriously voting it with a good precision of cognitive functions. So, when people saying "oh this person is a troll, oh you've got to be joking right there or oh you're not serious about your voting right and bla bla bla..." No, it's NOT and I would NEVER voting in here without thinking, researching and data, data and more than data itself. So, if you asking "I'm not believing in you... Where is your facts and data even you aren't give us the evidence." I do it on my perspective and notes, there is amount of time and effort doing this in my mind and head too. It's gave me too much headache for doing this to and I am not biased of course. I'm just doing this according to cognitive functions and that's I do. Nothing than that, so I begging for you. I'm here voting these thing in serious manner and I wouldn't have to compromise if I'm done exact things if it's not the correct way of typing or it's not the correct thing to do.

Editing post #10268 by nicotineseries To those who are observing my user while voting the entry, right? I'm not JOKING okay, you've got that. I'm seriously voting it with a good precision of cognitive functions. So, when people saying "oh this person is a troll, oh you've got to be joking right there or oh you're not serious about your voting right and bla bla bla..." No, it's NOT and I would NEVER voting in here without thinking, researching and data, data and more than data itself. So, if you asking "I'm not believing in you... Where is your facts and data even you aren't give us the evidence." I do it on my perspective and notes, there is amount of time and effort doing this in my mind and head too. It's gave me too much headache for doing this to and I am not biased of course. I'm just doing this according to cognitive functions and that's I do. Nothing than that, so I begging for you. I'm here voting these thing in serious manner and I wouldn't have to compromise if I'm done exact things if it's not the correct way of typing or it's not the correct thing to do.
Replying to post #10268 by nicotineseries

	nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi 2025/08/01 (Fri) 05:18:43 #10256
	I've tried to rethought the voting on my account here and I would probably changing anything that is not on my research cases. Because of that, I don't have any time to meditate on my mind and keep focus to one thing that it's should be done. Although of that if my words and what I've done in here are considerably rude I feel sorry for that. Thank you!

Editing post #10256 by nicotineseries I've tried to rethought the voting on my account here and I would probably changing anything that is not on my research cases. Because of that, I don't have any time to meditate on my mind and keep focus to one thing that it's should be done. Although of that if my words and what I've done in here are considerably rude I feel sorry for that. Thank you!
Replying to post #10256 by nicotineseries

date	username	vote
25/07/03 06:43	nicotineseries	ISFP

date	username	vote
25/08/15 10:37	nicotineseries	ISFP

date	username	vote
25/07/13 13:11	nicotineseries	6w5

date	username	vote
25/07/05 22:51	nicotineseries	sp/so

date	username	vote
25/07/22 14:23	nicotineseries	649
25/07/22 13:49	Woll Smoth	649

date	username	vote
25/08/15 10:07	nicotineseries	SEI

date	username	vote
25/07/13 12:11	nicotineseries	LEFV