Aldous Huxley ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Aldous Huxley

Writer

in Writing and Literature

Aldous Huxley ~ Sakinorva Databank

Aldous Huxley

Writer

Writing and Literature

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ENFP 3

4w5 4

sx/so 2

sx/sp 1

so/sx 1

sp/so 1

IEE 3

EII 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 24

8

3

4

5

4

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	lvna 2018/07/08 (Sun) 16:07:47 #1948
	I think he's a good example of the elusive EII...he was fairly able to switch between rational and irrational activity...I can't help but look at "The Doors of Perception" as reflecting a humanitarian desire to expand knowledge of psychedelic drugs and thier importance and he didn't simply use these drugs to catalyze creative experience as you might imagine from an IxI. The Russians seem to have typed him as LII, but it's hard for me to see him as someone who simply theorized to theorize...S inferior also perhaps makes sense...but he can still be INFP though I wouldn't say Js wouldn't do psychedelic substances it seems like during that time it would have mainly just been an "NP" thing...and in some sense it still is an N thing unless you are doing it for social capital or sheer exploration because you have to have high openness to interact with something that essentially presents a view of reality that is highly different from the one the west shepherds us into. I don't know what his Jung type might be though. Also, why Sx/So? I think in a more traditional sense he seems really self-grounded and he could be seen as So because of the more humanitarian vision but I just think maybe people have switched up Sx/So and Sx/Sp in their heads, Sx/So seems like the most unhinged type.

Editing post #1948 by lvna <p>I think he's a good example of the elusive EII...he was fairly able to switch between rational and irrational activity...I can't help but look at "The Doors of Perception" as reflecting a humanitarian desire to expand knowledge of psychedelic drugs and thier importance and he didn't simply use these drugs to catalyze creative experience as you might imagine from an IxI. The Russians seem to have typed him as LII, but it's hard for me to see him as someone who simply theorized to theorize...S inferior also perhaps makes sense...but he can still be INFP though I wouldn't say Js wouldn't do psychedelic substances it seems like during that time it would have mainly just been an "NP" thing...and in some sense it still is an N thing unless you are doing it for social capital or sheer exploration because you have to have high openness to interact with something that essentially presents a view of reality that is highly different from the one the west shepherds us into. I don't know what his Jung type might be though. Also, why Sx/So? I think in a more traditional sense he seems really self-grounded and he could be seen as So because of the more humanitarian vision but I just think maybe people have switched up Sx/So and Sx/Sp in their heads, Sx/So seems like the most unhinged type. </p>
Replying to post #1948 by lvna

date	username	vote
23/01/12 00:29	GIJOEBusta Cap	ENFP
19/09/22 19:47	ethan	ENFP
20/06/05 11:57	Flower-like	ENFP
18/12/02 17:39	twinpinks	ENFP
18/12/02 14:59	LadyX	INTP
18/07/08 04:18	lvna	INFP

date	username	vote
23/01/12 00:29	GIJOEBusta Cap	ENFP
20/08/31 16:50	Flower-like	ENFP

date	username	vote
23/01/12 00:29	GIJOEBusta Cap	4w5
18/12/02 15:00	LadyX	4w5

date	username	vote
18/12/02 15:00	LadyX	sp/so
18/07/08 04:17	lvna	sx/sp

date	username	vote
23/01/12 00:29	GIJOEBusta Cap	IEE
22/03/30 13:31	woll smoth	IEE
19/09/22 19:47	ethan	IEE
18/07/08 04:01	lvna	EII