Updates thread ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Updates thread

in

Updates thread ~ Sakinorva Databank

Updates thread

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 0

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/12/29 (Sat) 13:11:51 #4457
	I deleted a lot of entries for being too vague, confusing, or inapplicable. Entry types I might delete: MBTI types + their most common Enneagram types (can only vote one way, too theoretical), those vague "groups of people" entries (how does this work? typing societies or cultures is too out there), the website threads (same vein)

Editing post #4457 by strawberry crisis <p>I deleted a lot of entries for being too vague, confusing, or inapplicable. Entry types I might delete: MBTI types + their most common Enneagram types (can only vote one way, too theoretical), those vague "groups of people" entries (how does this work? typing societies or cultures is too out there), the website threads (same vein)</p>
Replying to post #4457 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/09/30 (Sun) 15:29:56 #3396
	Judgment day! For reference: Turi, Dr. Klemphoff, b0t, pill, malarken, Goku, roach, and LulzSec have all been disabled for voting twice as alternate accounts. I'll tolerate alternate accounts as long as they don't disrupt the votes (a disruption constitutes voting twice on one entry with at least two different accounts) and I kept these accounts active for as long as I did because it was entertaining for a while and I was curious what direction they'd go in, but I think it's gotten to a point where the databank is being manipulated by these accounts (regarding one person involved here in particular--you know who you are and I won't hesitate to disable your main account if you spam votes again) and they've long outlived their comedic value. If there's a rule I specifically mean to set in stone here: you cannot vote twice on an entry. I won't necessarily disallow alternate accounts, but I will disable them by my own discretion if I ever think it's getting out of hand. I know we all like to have fun, so I want to keep the moderation as light as possible while still being able to consider the databank sufficiently moderated; and if you have a problem with how the site is being moderated, I'll gladly discuss it with you to hopefully reach a resolution. And speaking of that, I'll be adding a flagging system soon so that you won't need to personally contact moderators or admins to report things. You'll be able to flag images, entries, comments, and accounts along with being able to report miscellaneous submissions that don't fall into clean categories like that. I'm thinking of merging this flagging queue with a notification system that would inform you about comment replies or likes, but that does require changing up a lot with the internal site mechanics and it might take a while--I wouldn't be able to give you a date on when all of this will be added. p.s. I'm aware of that capitalization thing on the names and I'm still not sure what I think about it. It helps to some extent with account impersonation but it's a little bit grating to see spelling inconsistencies all over. I might fix them to whatever they were during registration.

Editing post #3396 by strawberry crisis <p>Judgment day! For reference:<br> Turi, Dr. Klemphoff, b0t, pill, malarken, Goku, roach, and LulzSec have all been disabled for voting twice as alternate accounts. I'll tolerate alternate accounts as long as they don't disrupt the votes (a disruption constitutes voting twice on one entry with at least two different accounts) and I kept these accounts active for as long as I did because it was entertaining for a while and I was curious what direction they'd go in, but I think it's gotten to a point where the databank is being manipulated by these accounts (regarding one person involved here in particular--you know who you are and I won't hesitate to disable your main account if you spam votes again) and they've long outlived their comedic value. If there's a rule I specifically mean to set in stone here: <i><b>you cannot vote twice on an entry</b></i>. I won't necessarily disallow alternate accounts, but I will disable them by my own discretion if I ever think it's getting out of hand. I know we all like to have fun, so I want to keep the moderation as light as possible while still being able to consider the databank sufficiently moderated; and if you have a problem with how the site is being moderated, I'll gladly discuss it with you to hopefully reach a resolution.<br><br> And speaking of that, I'll be adding a flagging system soon so that you won't need to personally contact moderators or admins to report things. You'll be able to flag images, entries, comments, and accounts along with being able to report miscellaneous submissions that don't fall into clean categories like that. I'm thinking of merging this flagging queue with a notification system that would inform you about comment replies or likes, but that does require changing up a lot with the internal site mechanics and it might take a while--I wouldn't be able to give you a date on when all of this will be added.<br><br> p.s. I'm aware of that capitalization thing on the names and I'm still not sure what I think about it. It helps to some extent with account impersonation but it's a little bit grating to see spelling inconsistencies all over. I might fix them to whatever they were during registration.</p>
Replying to post #3396 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/08/05 (Sun) 22:43:01 #2589
	http://blog.sakinorva.net/article.php?title=in-essence and the guide to ichigo-kata I'm going to write out a more comprehensive article but this should give you an idea of what Ichigo-kata (苺 ichigokata get it @Stephen Hearts??) stands for and how it moves away from the more concrete and trait-by-trait style of typing many function-lovers get wrapped into. A good example of what an Ichigo-kata typing looks like is shown here. If you vote IDR often without taking the CelebrityTypes perspective into account and have an abstract, almost spiritually-disguised method of typing by The Functions, consider voting Ichigo-kata. It's time to bring in function mysticism. Note that because this is a very niche system that hasn't been explained very well yet, this column will be disabled by default. You can enable it in your profile. And also note that because this is a very special column that requires a strong understanding of what the eight essential functions represent, I won't be converting IDR votes to this column unless you can convince me that your typings in that column are justified in Ichigo-kata.

Editing post #2589 by strawberry crisis <a href="http://blog.sakinorva.net/article.php?title=in-essence">http://blog.sakinorva.net/article.php?title=in-essence</a> <a href="http://sakinorva.net/typology/ichigo-kata">and the guide to ichigo-kata</a> I'm going to write out a more comprehensive article but this should give you an idea of what Ichigo-kata (苺 <i>ichigokata</i> get it @Stephen Hearts??) stands for and how it moves away from the more concrete and trait-by-trait style of typing many function-lovers get wrapped into. A good example of what an Ichigo-kata typing looks like is shown <a href="https://index.sakinorva.net/view.php?id=121#2432">here</a>. If you vote IDR often without taking the CelebrityTypes perspective into account and have an abstract, almost spiritually-disguised method of typing by The Functions, consider voting Ichigo-kata. It's time to bring in function mysticism.<br><br> Note that because this is a very niche system that hasn't been explained very well yet, this column will be disabled by default. You can enable it in your profile.<br><br> And also note that because this is a very special column that requires a strong understanding of what the eight essential functions represent, I won't be converting IDR votes to this column unless you can convince me that your typings in that column are justified in Ichigo-kata.<br>
Replying to post #2589 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/13 (Wed) 11:33:24 #1213
	I turned the MBTI voting into a chart similar to how 16personalities highlights your preferences after giving you its results and converted all the old votes into "strongest preference" votes in the new system I've made for it; you now have the option to vote for different strengths for an entry's MBTI preferences if you click on "toggle adv. vote (mbti)," but you can also vote as you had been doing before to submit votes with "strongest preferences." For example, I can vote 0.5 I, 0.25 S, 0.75 F, 1 J in the advanced voting settings for a character I want to distinguish preferences for, or I may vote "ISFJ" and submit 1 I, 1 S, 1 F, and 1 J to the table instead. Since votes get averaged out now, I think using the advanced voting options whenever possible may be more beneficial for us in the long run since it would provide a more precise picture of how we interpret all these personalities behind the entries. If there are any problems with the voting, I'll be back late tonight to (try and) fix them. Ta-ta!

Editing post #1213 by strawberry crisis <p>I turned the MBTI voting into a chart similar to how 16personalities highlights your preferences after giving you its results and converted all the old votes into "strongest preference" votes in the new system I've made for it; you now have the option to vote for different strengths for an entry's MBTI preferences if you click on "toggle adv. vote (mbti)," but you can also vote as you had been doing before to submit votes with "strongest preferences."<br><br> For example, I can vote 0.5 I, 0.25 S, 0.75 F, 1 J in the advanced voting settings for a character I want to distinguish preferences for, or I may vote "ISFJ" and submit 1 I, 1 S, 1 F, and 1 J to the table instead. Since votes get averaged out now, I think using the advanced voting options whenever possible may be more beneficial for us in the long run since it would provide a more precise picture of how we interpret all these personalities behind the entries.<br><br> If there are any problems with the voting, I'll be back late tonight to (try and) fix them. Ta-ta!</p>
Replying to post #1213 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/05/29 (Tue) 17:50:58 #838
	I added a new voting column called Postulated IDRlabs type or just "idr" for short. "Intended use": Guess what a person or character's typing would be based on how CelebrityTypes/IDRlabs types people Intended use: Pretend to type people as though you worked for CelebrityTypes, or use The Functions to type people Actual use: Probably just voting using The Functions I'd just rather not have too much collusion between function typing and MBTI typing since they're not the same thing and voting MBTI for those functions isn't correct if the person's actual MBTI type isn't the function type. But if it's not used enough in the directly-IDRlabs-related way then I'll just call it The Functions

Editing post #838 by strawberry crisis <p>I added a new voting column called <b>Postulated IDRlabs type</b> or just "idr" for short.<br><br> "Intended use": Guess what a person or character's typing would be based on how CelebrityTypes/IDRlabs types people<br> Intended use: Pretend to type people as though you worked for CelebrityTypes, or use The Functions to type people<br> Actual use: Probably just voting using The Functions<br><br> I'd just rather not have too much collusion between function typing and MBTI typing since they're not the same thing and voting MBTI for those functions isn't correct if the person's actual MBTI type isn't the function type. But if it's not used enough in the directly-IDRlabs-related way then I'll just call it The Functions</p>
Replying to post #838 by strawberry crisis