Lil Kim ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Lil Kim

rapper

in Music and Performing Arts

Lil Kim ~ Sakinorva Databank

Lil Kim

rapper

Music and Performing Arts

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ESTP 1

3w4 1

sx/so 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 5

2

1

1

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/08/16 (Thu) 15:23:11 #2857
	Being future-oriented in that single-minded way is generally only indicative of judging or sensing (depending on how it's defined) in MBTI if it can be tied to anything at all. Locking yourself into a procedural process to meet an end goal that was envisioned by traits that may or may not be intuitive is a poor, poor way of attributing an intuition preference of some kind to someone, be it in actual MBTI or Nu-MBTI. I've always thought of that as a "compromising mechanism" for actual judgers to be able to relate to an otherwise very floaty and perceivingly-defined set of traits (like having things come to you rather than being proactive in creating the inevitable closure strong perceivers hate) and the N in Ni begins to shift in meaning to something that allows enough room for nonsense like S meaning being more attentive to its surroundings by definition. Maybe it's okay if Nu-MBTI adopts a warped idea of S and N since in the end it isn't MBTI, but deciding to use its ideas of S and N to guide you in typing them in MBTI without properly analyzing how its traits actually match up against those that are defined in MBTI will lead you to make very strange conclusions.

Editing post #2857 by strawberry crisis <p>Being future-oriented in that single-minded way is generally only indicative of judging or sensing (depending on how it's defined) in MBTI if it can be tied to anything at all. Locking yourself into a procedural process to meet an end goal that was <em>envisioned</em> by traits that may or may not be intuitive is a poor, poor way of attributing an intuition preference of some kind to someone, be it in actual MBTI or Nu-MBTI. I've always thought of that as a "compromising mechanism" for actual judgers to be able to relate to an otherwise very floaty and perceivingly-defined set of traits (like having things come to you rather than being proactive in creating the inevitable closure strong perceivers hate) and the N in Ni begins to shift in meaning to something that allows enough room for nonsense like S meaning being more attentive to its surroundings <em>by definition. </em>Maybe it's okay if Nu-MBTI adopts a warped idea of S and N since in the end it isn't MBTI, but deciding to use its ideas of S and N to guide you in typing them in MBTI without properly analyzing how its traits actually match up against those that are defined in MBTI will lead you to make very strange conclusions.</p>
Replying to post #2857 by strawberry crisis

date	username	vote
20/02/04 15:26	bibliology	ESFP
18/08/16 10:35	kawaii	ESFP

date	username	vote
18/08/16 10:35	kawaii	ESTP

date	username	vote
18/07/23 04:15	kawaii	3w4

date	username	vote
20/02/04 15:26	bibliology	sx/so