Etsuko Yakushimaru ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Etsuko Yakushimaru

Soutaiseiriron

in Music and Performing Arts

Etsuko Yakushimaru ~ Sakinorva Databank

Etsuko Yakushimaru

Yakushimaru Etsuko

Soutaiseiriron

Music and Performing Arts

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

INFJ 1

5w4 1

sx/sp 1

IEI 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 6

1

1

1

1

1

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2018/09/30 (Sun) 03:05:20 #3394
	cognitive function =/= socionics function " What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI. Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things). For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful. " http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/model-a.html

Editing post #3394 by fg <p>cognitive function =/= socionics function "</p> <p>What do these signs mean—<strong><img alt="" src="http://www.socioniko.net/func/I.gif" style="height:15px; width:15px" /></strong>, <strong><img alt="" src="http://www.socioniko.net/func/T.gif" style="height:15px; width:15px" /></strong>, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, <strong><img alt="" src="http://www.socioniko.net/func/I.gif" style="height:15px; width:15px" /></strong> (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.</p> <p>Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function <strong><img alt="" src="http://www.socioniko.net/func/F.gif" style="height:15px; width:15px" /></strong> (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).</p> <p><strong>For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful. " </strong>http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/model-a.html</p> <p> </p>
Replying to post #3394 by fg

date	username	vote
18/09/30 03:00	mstr-Îº	INFP

date	username	vote
18/09/30 02:58	mstr-Îº	INFJ

date	username	vote
18/09/30 02:52	mstr-Îº	5w4

date	username	vote
18/09/30 02:46	mstr-Îº	sx/sp

date	username	vote
18/09/30 02:54	mstr-Îº	459

date	username	vote
18/09/30 02:44	mstr-Îº	IEI