strawberry crisis ~ Sakinorva Databank

strawberry crisis

Personality-Databank

Users

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ENTP 9

ENFP 6

7w6 11

7w8 6

6w7 1

cp6w7 1

so/sx 8

IEE 11

ILI 1

ILE 1

EVLF 4

VLFE 1

total votes 81

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/04/13 (Mon) 19:12:14 #7979
	In response to post #7978. cp7w6 was what I'd decided on for myself back when I couldn't figure out what possibly connected me to wing 6—I knew my "worldview" and general attitude wasn't compatible with 8 even though I shared some surface-level traits with the type while practically none with type 6. I see things a little differently now and both that worldview and how such a worldview would change the way I behave plays along better with 8 than either counterphobic or phobic 6.

Editing post #7979 by strawberry crisis cp7w6 was what I'd decided on for myself back when I couldn't figure out what possibly connected me to wing 6—I knew my "worldview" and general attitude wasn't compatible with 8 even though I shared some surface-level traits with the type while practically none with type 6. I see things a little differently now and both that worldview and how such a worldview would change the way I behave plays along better with 8 than either counterphobic or phobic 6.
Replying to post #7979 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/12/02 (Mon) 00:57:50 #7481
	I'm testing editing on the new layout. April 6, 2020. Let me try editing this again! Yes, I think online it's generally hardest to make out preferences A and D in someone's type ABCD. I've usually understood this more as A and C coming across as ambiguous for myself here so I'm imagining a "yes I see F and P but not so much N and even less E" thought process behind it and it's mildly amusing

Editing post #7481 by strawberry crisis I'm testing editing on the new layout. April 6, 2020.<br /> Let me try editing this again! <br /> Yes, I think online it's generally hardest to make out preferences A and D in someone's type ABCD. I've usually understood this more as A and C coming across as ambiguous for myself here so I'm imagining a "yes I see F and P but not so much N and even less E" thought process behind it and it's mildly amusing <br />
Replying to post #7481 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/09/13 (Thu) 04:56:59 #3251
	Now that I’ve introduced tritype voting, I’ve been wondering how I’d realistically match up to the types on a scale like I’ve provided. I’ve identified with 279 for a while even though I don’t feel particularly connected to 2 or 9... or any of the other non-7 types. Or so I thought. Quantifying types you never thought about putting on a scale from 0 to 10 is a weird, weird exercise, and I was honestly unsure what to give types like 1 and 6. It’s part of why I can’t really like tritypes—am I gauging my connection to the cores of the types? Am I rating how relatable traits from other types are? Is it what type in a center I default to? I rated everything that wasn’t 7 below 0.5, sorting it out as 7 (1) > 56 (0.4) > 129 (0.3) > 3 (0.2) > 48 (0.1). But it’s 6 that I’m still so intrigued by. I related a lot to Rowe’s Social 6 description by started having second thoughts about it after reading other Social 6 descriptions and comparing them to Social 7 descriptions (Beatrice Chestnut’s So 7 is maybe the most relatable subtype description I’ve found), I could only connect So 6 traits I exhibited back to the So 7 outlook. I can’t relate to that overt sense of phobia and seeking security at all, and patterns throughout my life just show how extremely not Sp, J, or conscientious I am in a way that should resonate with most other Sixes. I knew I couldn’t possibly be an 8 wing with how much I devalue structure and certainty, but just how 6 was my 6? A lingering feeling that I couldn’t seem to place on the Enneagram was a feeling of “not wanting to be weak” and “overcoming my limits by pretending they weren’t there,” and articulating it made it sound like it should have been an Enneagram type of its own that didn’t yet exist—I knew it wasn’t something I could connect to 8 because I interpret weakness and vulnerability in a very different way that connects more to self-control and self-acceptance rather than guardedness and self-denial. And then... Intimate Sixes • Lead disciplined lives that bring them strength – physical, emotional or spiritual. Being strong calms their fears. • Creative; need to transform a harsh world into a beautiful one; often confused with Self preservation Fours. • This subtype brings an artist’s eye and an aesthetic perspective, an acute awareness of beauty, a love of nature and landscape. • Sixes with this subtype tend to act strong or alluring when insecure. • More likely to be counterphobic; they take risks, talk tough, worry about looking weak, having their fears show. • When beauty is the focus they try to seem attractive to contain fear, get approval and distract others. • Some need to create and make things, to transform what they see and feel into something tangible. • Can be image conscious; their preoccupation with beauty can mutate into personal vanity; a stronger connection to Three. • May hide and contain their fears behind an attractive mask; a sense of protective distance and once-removed control. • A defiant/aggressive life stance is possible, an imitation of strength. • Anti-authoritarian and knee-jerk rebellious. • Intimate Sixes may project their power onto a sexual partner or sexuality itself; some report feeling addicted to sex. • Project power onto authorities and then fight with them. • Can be reckless, impulsive and prone to bad judgment. • Whatever the question the answer is no; can be mistaken for Eights. • This subtype can conflict with the Self preservation impulse in Sixes. Being creatively daring, open and unguarded is at odds with surviving and staying safe. • If self preservation Sixes are addicted to security, Intimate Sixes are addicted to insecurity. I didn’t really see much in Sx 6 descriptions before, but if counterphobia is a reaction to inner fear that manifests in the same way escapism does with inner anxiety, then I resonate a lot with the counterphobic 6. It’s interesting because looking at it this way allows me to draw lines of cp6 to things I’d previously attributed to just a very not-self-preservation-focused 7: ”Look at that little cactus!” “What if I took a bite out of it?” “What??” I guess I wasn’t paying a lot of attention because tiny cactus spines found their way into my fingers and it took foreeeever to get them out. But that “I bet you can’t / bet you I will” attitude is something I’d want to attribute to cp 6, particularly cp 7w6. And I’ve noticed that it’s extremely dependent on the audience for me; I wouldn’t do these things alone because I have nothing to “show” anyone. Might that be related to the image-conscious side of Sx 6? Pushing boundaries and pretending they don’t exist comes from the same place: consciousness of the “rules” and being aware of the limits and yet pretending that these limits don’t exist—that sounds like a red flag for counterphobic 6. Testing relationships by willfully “breaking rules” and pushing them to their limit—sounds an awful lot like counterphobic 6. Having fun by working against what keeps me secure—also counterphobic 6. This wasn’t an easy connection for me to make since everything is left so ambiguous by Enneagram authors trying to explain what the Enneagram even is, but whatever this brand of it that allows cp 7w6s to exist is would be just my thing. But blogging aside, I think I want to give my tritype 6 vote a strong 0.8 now. It feels extremely secondary and I can only easily recognize it in counterphobic contexts, but it’s gotta be strong, right?

Editing post #3251 by strawberry crisis <p>Now that I’ve introduced tritype voting, I’ve been wondering how I’d realistically match up to the types on a scale like I’ve provided. I’ve identified with 279 for a while even though I don’t feel particularly connected to 2 or 9... or any of the other non-7 types. Or so I thought. Quantifying types you never thought about putting on a scale from 0 to 10 is a weird, weird exercise, and I was honestly unsure what to give types like 1 and 6. It’s part of why I can’t really like tritypes—am I gauging my connection to the cores of the types? Am I rating how relatable traits from other types are? Is it what type in a center I default to? I rated everything that wasn’t 7 below 0.5, sorting it out as 7 (1) > 56 (0.4) > 129 (0.3) > 3 (0.2) > 48 (0.1).<br><br> But it’s 6 that I’m still so intrigued by. I related a lot to Rowe’s Social 6 description by started having second thoughts about it after reading other Social 6 descriptions and comparing them to Social 7 descriptions (Beatrice Chestnut’s So 7 is maybe the most relatable subtype description I’ve found), I could only connect So 6 traits I exhibited back to the So 7 outlook. I can’t relate to that overt sense of phobia and seeking security at all, and patterns throughout my life just show how extremely not Sp, J, or conscientious I am in a way that should resonate with most other Sixes. I knew I couldn’t possibly be an 8 wing with how much I devalue structure and certainty, but just how 6 was my 6?<br><br> A lingering feeling that I couldn’t seem to place on the Enneagram was a feeling of “not wanting to be weak” and “overcoming my limits by pretending they weren’t there,” and articulating it made it sound like it should have been an Enneagram type of its own that didn’t yet exist—I knew it wasn’t something I could connect to 8 because I interpret weakness and vulnerability in a very different way that connects more to self-control and self-acceptance rather than guardedness and self-denial. And then...<br><br> <em>Intimate Sixes<br /> • Lead disciplined lives that bring them strength – physical, emotional or spiritual. Being strong calms their fears.<br /> • Creative; need to transform a harsh world into a beautiful one; often confused with Self preservation Fours.<br /> • This subtype brings an artist’s eye and an aesthetic perspective, an acute awareness of beauty, a love of nature and landscape.<br /> • Sixes with this subtype tend to act strong or alluring when insecure.<br /> • More likely to be counterphobic; they take risks, talk tough, worry about looking weak, having their fears show.<br /> • When beauty is the focus they try to seem attractive to contain fear, get approval and distract others.<br /> • Some need to create and make things, to transform what they see and feel into something tangible.<br /> • Can be image conscious; their preoccupation with beauty can mutate into personal vanity; a stronger connection to Three.<br /> • May hide and contain their fears behind an attractive mask; a sense of protective distance and once-removed control.<br /> • A defiant/aggressive life stance is possible, an imitation of strength.<br /> • Anti-authoritarian and knee-jerk rebellious.<br /> • Intimate Sixes may project their power onto a sexual partner or sexuality itself; some report feeling addicted to sex.<br /> • Project power onto authorities and then fight with them.<br /> • Can be reckless, impulsive and prone to bad judgment.<br /> • Whatever the question the answer is no; can be mistaken for Eights.<br /> • This subtype can conflict with the Self preservation impulse in Sixes. Being creatively daring, open and unguarded is at odds with surviving and staying safe.<br /> • If self preservation Sixes are addicted to security, Intimate Sixes are addicted to insecurity.</em><br><br> I didn’t really see much in Sx 6 descriptions before, but if counterphobia is a reaction to inner fear that manifests in the same way escapism does with inner anxiety, then I resonate a lot with the counterphobic 6. It’s interesting because looking at it this way allows me to draw lines of cp6 to things I’d previously attributed to just a very not-self-preservation-focused 7:<br><br> ”Look at that little cactus!”<br> “What if I took a bite out of it?”<br> “What??”<br> <br>I guess I wasn’t paying a lot of attention because tiny cactus spines found their way into my fingers and it took foreeeever to get them out. But that “I bet you can’t / bet you I will” attitude is something I’d want to attribute to cp 6, particularly cp 7w6. And I’ve noticed that it’s extremely dependent on the audience for me; I wouldn’t do these things alone because I have nothing to “show” anyone. Might that be related to the image-conscious side of Sx 6? <br><br> Pushing boundaries and pretending they don’t exist comes from the same place: consciousness of the “rules” and being aware of the limits and yet pretending that these limits don’t exist—that sounds like a red flag for counterphobic 6. Testing relationships by willfully “breaking rules” and pushing them to their limit—sounds an awful lot like counterphobic 6. Having fun by working against what keeps me secure—also counterphobic 6. This wasn’t an easy connection for me to make since everything is left so ambiguous by Enneagram authors trying to explain what the Enneagram even is, but whatever this brand of it that allows cp 7w6s to exist is would be just my thing.<br><br> But blogging aside, I think I want to give my tritype 6 vote a strong 0.8 now. It feels extremely secondary and I can only easily recognize it in counterphobic contexts, but it’s gotta be strong, right?</p>
Replying to post #3251 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/07/10 (Tue) 16:06:10 #2037
	Hahaha, I'm flattered but I'm not sure if I'd consider myself productive, especially to the point where I could see 3 in a tritype. I just place a lot of emphasis on doing things as opposed to just thinking about them and restricting those ideas to my head, which from what I know is only very 7 in principle. Type 3 emphasizes achieving things to favor an image, but I just chase after whatever I find appealing without necessarily having that in mind the way 3 does.

Editing post #2037 by strawberry crisis <p>Hahaha, I'm flattered but I'm not sure if I'd consider myself productive, especially to the point where I could see 3 in a tritype. I just place a lot of emphasis on doing things as opposed to just thinking about them and restricting those ideas to my head, which from what I know is only very 7 in principle. Type 3 emphasizes achieving things to favor an image, but I just chase after whatever I find appealing without necessarily having that in mind the way 3 does.</p>
Replying to post #2037 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/07/10 (Tue) 15:37:59 #2031
	Yes—of all the subtype descriptions, I think the Ni subtype for LIE does suit me best! I'll highlight what I myself relate to, though: LIE-Ni subtype: Appearance: The intuitive subtype is pleasant and considerate in dialogue. He can be affectionate and cheerful, possesses a developed sense of humor, often becomes the soul of a company. Inspired, energetic, and optimistic. Mobile, restless, scattered, always in a hurry, aiming to accomplish much in time. Very enterprising, boldly takes risks. It's hard for him to concentrate on one thing for a long period of time. He has many ideas. Always has several points where he can apply his efforts. Diplomatic and gallant with everyone, especially with women, but can show familiarity at closer acquaintance. Due to his inclination to unceremoniousness, his sense of tact often fails him, and he commits ethical mistakes, which he tries to correct and mend with the help of jokes and his services. Behaves himself simply, uninhibitedly, freely and easily. In conversation sometimes like to touch his conversation partner, to hug, to kiss, to make jokes. His gestures and gait lack ostentatious solidity and seem very natural. Character: This is a person of action with a developed creative beginning. Has an active practical mind, very curious, and boldly experiments. Often constructs far-reaching but concrete plans. Impulsive, cheerful, enterprising, easily takes initiative in new projects and beginnings. Quickly turns to work, inspiring others to get involved with his own enthusiasm. Bravely tackles implementing new ideas to life, as he sees their prospects well into the future. Brave, resourceful, far-sighted and shrewd. Instantly orients in extreme situations and develops an effective plan of action. If he is not involved in some project or activity, he starts to feel bored and his vitality falls, but usually he is able to quickly find application of his abilities in any activity. Somewhat scattered, inclined to get distracted by secondary and unimportant things, due to which may put off the main work until later, but after a while returns to it. Impatient by nature, may be careless and negligent with details. Dislikes competing, manifesting selfish interests, demanding his right to something. May cede his positions to more obstinate and insistent partners. For the sake of justice or to defend an idea in which he believes, may sacrifice his own interests. Fluctuates in choosing which decision to go with, due to which it is easy to talk him out of what he has conceived. Due to internal doubts and contradictions he can be unpredictable in his behavior. With difficulty endures the crash of his hopes, but, with the inherent to his optimism, is not averse to start everything anew, not looking back. Gravitates towards new impressions and changes, often changes his hobbies and interests, tries and tests himself in different spheres of activity and occupations. A romantic at heart, enjoys travel, sharp and thrilling impressions, sometimes tests and risks with his fate. Faithful in relations, but not averse to flirting. His personal life is often rather complicated and changeable. Emotional, fidgety, restless. Tries to do everything in time and feels very worried when he sees that he cannot accomplish everything by the deadlines. He is often in a hurry himself, and hurries and urges others. Negatively refers to those who are lazy, who seek convenience and enjoyment. In conversations, he is lively and welcoming. Seems sincere, original, straightforward, and predisposing towards trust. Attentive towards other people, delves into their problems, gives advice, offers his services, tries to encourage them, make them laugh with jokes. If in the interests of the work or business he finds it necessary to put pressure on other people, tries to do it in inoffensive form, although he may be too direct and pushy. Sometimes his sense of tact fails, and he can inadvertently offend his conversation partner, but then he tries to fix the situation immediately or very soon. He is docile in nature: it's difficult to pick a quarrel with him. Interested in various unsolved and unexplored phenomena. Tries to comprehend the essence of various events and manifestations. Reflects and thinks over scientific, moral, and philosophical questions. In his soul he is somewhat suspicious and superstitious. At home undemanding, can do with very little. Loves children and animals. Pays little attention to his appearance. Wanting to be loved not for his appearance, but for his inner qualities. In need of a person who can keep him from committing rash actions. (maybe)

Editing post #2031 by strawberry crisis <p>Yes—of all the subtype descriptions, I think the Ni subtype for LIE does suit me best! I'll highlight what I myself relate to, though:</p><br> <p>LIE-Ni subtype:</p><br> <p>Appearance: <strong><font color="f9f9de">The intuitive subtype is pleasant and considerate in dialogue. He can be affectionate and cheerful, possesses a developed sense of humor, often becomes the soul of a company. Inspired, energetic, and optimistic. Mobile, restless, scattered, always in a hurry, aiming to accomplish much in time. Very enterprising, boldly takes risks. It's hard for him to concentrate on one thing for a long period of time. He has many ideas. Always has several points where he can apply his efforts. Diplomatic and gallant with everyone, especially with women, but can show familiarity at closer acquaintance. Due to his inclination to unceremoniousness, his sense of tact often fails him, and he commits ethical mistakes, which he tries to correct and mend with the help of jokes and his services. Behaves himself simply, uninhibitedly, freely and easily. In conversation sometimes like to touch his conversation partner, to hug, </font></strong>to kiss,<strong><font color="f9f9de"> to make jokes. His gestures and gait lack ostentatious solidity and seem very natural.</strong></font></p><br> <p>Character: <strong><font color="f9f9de">This is a person of action with a developed creative beginning. Has an active practical mind, very curious, and boldly experiments. Often constructs far-reaching but concrete plans. Impulsive, cheerful, enterprising, easily takes initiative in new projects and beginnings. </strong></font>Quickly turns to work,<strong><font color="f9f9de"> inspiring others to get involved with his own enthusiasm. Bravely tackles implementing new ideas to life,</font></strong> as he sees their prospects well into the future.<strong><font color="f9f9de"> Brave, resourceful</font></strong>, far-sighted and shrewd<strong><font color="f9f9de">. Instantly orients in extreme situations and develops an effective plan of action. If he is not involved in some project or activity, he starts to feel bored and his vitality falls, but usually he is able to quickly find application of his abilities in any activity.</strong></font></p><br> <p><strong><font color="f9f9de">Somewhat scattered, inclined to get distracted by secondary and unimportant things, due to which may put off the main work until later, but after a while returns to it. Impatient by nature, may be careless and negligent with details. Dislikes competing, manifesting selfish interests, demanding his right to something. May cede his positions to more obstinate and insistent partners. For the sake of justice or to defend an idea in which he believes, may sacrifice his own interests.</strong></font></p><br> <p><strong><font color="f9f9de">Fluctuates in choosing which decision to go with, due to which it is easy to talk him out of what he has conceived. Due to internal doubts and contradictions he can be unpredictable in his behavior. </strong></font>With difficulty endures the crash of his hopes, but,<strong><font color="f9f9de"> with the inherent to his optimism, is not averse to start everything anew, not looking back. Gravitates towards new impressions and changes, often changes his hobbies and interests, tries and tests himself in different spheres of activity and occupations. A romantic at heart, enjoys travel, sharp and thrilling impressions, sometimes tests and risks with his fate. Faithful in relations, but not averse to flirting. His personal life is often rather complicated and changeable.</strong></font></p><br> <p>Emotional,<strong><font color="f9f9de"> fidgety, restless. </strong></font>Tries to do everything in time and feels very worried when he sees that he cannot accomplish everything by the deadlines.<strong><font color="f9f9de"> He is often in a hurry himself, and hurries and urges others. </font></strong>Negatively refers to those who are lazy, who seek convenience and enjoyment. <strong><font color="f9f9de">In conversations, he is lively and welcoming. Seems sincere, original, straightforward, and predisposing towards trust. Attentive towards other people, delves into their problems, gives advice, offers his services, tries to encourage them, make them laugh with jokes. If in the interests of the work or business he finds it necessary to put pressure on other people, tries to do it in inoffensive form, although he may be too direct and pushy. Sometimes his sense of tact fails, and he can inadvertently offend his conversation partner, but then he tries to fix the situation immediately or very soon. He is docile in nature: it's difficult to pick a quarrel with him.</strong></font></p><br> <p><strong><font color="f9f9de">Interested in various unsolved and unexplored phenomena. Tries to comprehend the essence of various events and manifestations. </font></strong>Reflects and thinks over scientific, moral, and philosophical questions. In his soul he is somewhat suspicious and superstitious. <strong><font color="f9f9de">At home undemanding, can do with very little. Loves children and animals. </font></strong>Pays little attention to his appearance. Wanting to be loved not for his appearance, but for his inner qualities. In need of a person who can keep him from committing rash actions. (maybe)</p>
Replying to post #2031 by strawberry crisis

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2018/07/10 (Tue) 04:47:59 #2003
	LIE-Ni subtype:"Appearance: The intuitive subtype is pleasant and considerate in dialogue. He can be affectionate and cheerful, possesses a developed sense of humor, often becomes the soul of a company. Inspired, energetic, and optimistic. Mobile, restless, scattered, always in a hurry, aiming to accomplish much in time. Very enterprising, boldly takes risks. It's hard for him to concentrate on one thing for a long period of time. He has many ideas. Always has several points where he can apply his efforts. Diplomatic and gallant with everyone, especially with women, but can show familiarity at closer acquaintance. Due to his inclination to unceremoniousness, his sense of tact often fails him, and he commits ethical mistakes, which he tries to correct and mend with the help of jokes and his services. Behaves himself simply, uninhibitedly, freely and easily. In conversation sometimes like to touch his conversation partner, to hug, to kiss, to make jokes. His gestures and gait lack ostentatious solidity and seem very natural. Character: This is a person of action with a developed creative beginning. Has an active practical mind, very curious, and boldly experiments. Often constructs far-reaching but concrete plans. Impulsive, cheerful, enterprising, easily takes initiative in new projects and beginnings. Quickly turns to work, inspiring others to get involved with his own enthusiasm. Bravely tackles implementing new ideas to life, as he sees their prospects well into the future. Brave, resourceful, far-sighted and shrewd. Instantly orients in extreme situations and develops an effective plan of action. If he is not involved in some project or activity, he starts to feel bored and his vitality falls, but usually he is able to quickly find application of his abilities in any activity. Somewhat scattered, inclined to get distracted by secondary and unimportant things, due to which may put off the main work until later, but after a while returns to it. Impatient by nature, may be careless and negligent with details. Dislikes competing, manifesting selfish interests, demanding his right to something. May cede his positions to more obstinate and insistent partners. For the sake of justice or to defend an idea in which he believes, may sacrifice his own interests. Fluctuates in choosing which decision to go with, due to which it is easy to talk him out of what he has conceived. Due to internal doubts and contradictions he can be unpredictable in his behavior. With difficulty endures the crash of his hopes, but, with the inherent to his optimism, is not averse to start everything anew, not looking back. Gravitates towards new impressions and changes, often changes his hobbies and interests, tries and tests himself in different spheres of activity and occupations. A romantic at heart, enjoys travel, sharp and thrilling impressions, sometimes tests and risks with his fate. Faithful in relations, but not averse to flirting. His personal life is often rather complicated and changeable. Emotional, fidgety, restless. Tries to do everything in time and feels very worried when he sees that he cannot accomplish everything by the deadlines. He is often in a hurry himself, and hurries and urges others. Negatively refers to those who are lazy, who seek convenience and enjoyment. In conversations, he is lively and welcoming. Seems sincere, original, straightforward, and predisposing towards trust. Attentive towards other people, delves into their problems, gives advice, offers his services, tries to encourage them, make them laugh with jokes. If in the interests of the work or business he finds it necessary to put pressure on other people, tries to do it in inoffensive form, although he may be too direct and pushy. Sometimes his sense of tact fails, and he can inadvertently offend his conversation partner, but then he tries to fix the situation immediately or very soon. He is docile in nature: it's difficult to pick a quarrel with him. Interested in various unsolved and unexplored phenomena. Tries to comprehend the essence of various events and manifestations. Reflects and thinks over scientific, moral, and philosophical questions. In his soul he is somewhat suspicious and superstitious. At home undemanding, can do with very little. Loves children and animals. Pays little attention to his appearance. Wanting to be loved not for his appearance, but for his inner qualities. In need of a person who can keep him from committing rash actions."

Editing post #2003 by fg <p>LIE-Ni subtype:"Appearance: <strong>The intuitive subtype is pleasant and considerate in dialogue. He can be affectionate and cheerful, possesses a developed sense of humor, often becomes the soul of a company. Inspired, energetic, and optimistic. Mobile, restless, scattered, always in a hurry, aiming to accomplish much in time.</strong> Very enterprising, boldly takes risks. It's hard for him to concentrate on one thing for a long period of time. He has many ideas. Always has several points where he can apply his efforts.<strong> Diplomatic and gallant with everyone, </strong>especially with women, but can show familiarity at closer acquaintance. Due to his inclination to unceremoniousness, his sense of tact often fails him, and he commits ethical mistakes, which he tries to correct and mend with the help of jokes and his services.<strong> Behaves himself simply, uninhibitedly, freely and easily. In conversation sometimes like to touch his conversation partner, to hug, to kiss, to make jokes.</strong> His gestures and gait lack ostentatious solidity and seem very natural.<br /> <br /> Character: <strong>This is a person of action with a developed creative beginning. Has an active practical mind, very curious, and boldly experiments. Often constructs far-reaching but concrete plans. Impulsive, cheerful, enterprising, easily takes initiative in new projects and beginnings.</strong> Quickly turns to work, inspiring others to get involved with his own enthusiasm. Bravely tackles implementing new ideas to life, as he sees their prospects well into the future. <strong>Brave, resourceful, far-sighted and shrewd. </strong>Instantly orients in extreme situations and develops an effective plan of action. If he is not involved in some project or activity, he starts to feel bored and his vitality falls, but usually he is able to quickly find application of his abilities in any activity.<br /> <br /> <strong>Somewhat scattered,</strong> <strong>inclined to get distracted by secondary and unimportant things, due to which may put off the main work until later, but after a while returns to it. Impatient by nature, may be careless and negligent with details. Dislikes competing, manifesting selfish interests, demanding his right to something. May cede his positions to more obstinate and insistent partners. For the sake of justice or to defend an idea in which he believes, may sacrifice his own interests.</strong><br /> <br /> Fluctuates in choosing which decision to go with, due to which it is easy to talk him out of what he has conceived. Due to internal doubts and contradictions he can be unpredictable in his behavior. With difficulty endures the crash of his hopes, but, with the inherent to his optimism, is not averse to start everything anew, not looking back. Gravitates towards new impressions and changes, often changes his hobbies and interests, tries and tests himself in different spheres of activity and occupations. A romantic at heart, enjoys travel, sharp and thrilling impressions, sometimes tests and risks with his fate. Faithful in relations, but not averse to flirting. His personal life is often rather complicated and changeable.<br /> <br /> Emotional, fidgety, restless. Tries to do everything in time and feels very worried when he sees that he cannot accomplish everything by the deadlines. He is often in a hurry himself, and hurries and urges others. Negatively refers to those who are lazy, who seek convenience and enjoyment. In conversations, he is lively and welcoming. Seems sincere, original, straightforward, and predisposing towards trust. <strong>Attentive towards other people, delves into their problems, gives advice, offers his services, tries to encourage them, make them laugh with jokes. If in the interests of the work or business he finds it necessary to put pressure on other people, tries to do it in inoffensive form, although he may be too direct and pushy. Sometimes his sense of tact fails, and he can inadvertently offend his conversation partner, but then he tries to fix the situation immediately or very soon. He is docile in nature: it's difficult to pick a quarrel with him.</strong><br /> <br /> <strong>Interested in various unsolved and unexplored phenomena. </strong>Tries to comprehend the essence of various events and manifestations. Reflects and thinks over scientific, moral, and philosophical questions. In his soul he is somewhat suspicious and superstitious. At home undemanding, can do with very little. Loves children and animals. Pays little attention to his appearance. Wanting to be loved not for his appearance, but for his inner qualities. In need of a person who can keep him from committing rash actions."</p>
Replying to post #2003 by fg

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/17 (Sun) 19:43:34 #1268
	I agree that CT would definitely give me an F typing but I think they might like ESFP more than ENFP provided that their takeaway focuses on how I have a strong emphasis on doing things as opposed to keeping things inside my head or contemplating for the sake of contemplating. I think based off of how I come across online they could go either way but how I tend to really act would be seen almost certainly as ESFP, where my excitement and experience orientation would show much more easily (as opposed to an intellectual orientation). Positivity, directness, sociability, and immediacy turn you into an ESFP there despite how creative, imaginative, or novelty-seeking you can be, and I think those apply to me much more than the more heady, abstractly-indulgent idea they have of ENFPs. There's also that whole thing where their ENFPs tend to be more serious about causes or things they believe in (revolutionary Fi politician) while their ESFPs are more fun, harmonious and focused on standing out (unchained Fi fashionista), where I think the latter applies to me a lot more. I think a lot of it depends on what part of me they see, too, but I do think that I as a whole might come up more as an ESFP to them.

Editing post #1268 by strawberry crisis <p>I agree that CT would definitely give me an F typing but I think they might like ESFP more than ENFP provided that their takeaway focuses on how I have a strong emphasis on doing things as opposed to keeping things inside my head or contemplating for the sake of contemplating. I think based off of how I come across online they could go either way but how I tend to really act would be seen almost certainly as ESFP, where my excitement and experience orientation would show much more easily (as opposed to an intellectual orientation). Positivity, directness, sociability, and immediacy turn you into an ESFP there despite how creative, imaginative, or novelty-seeking you can be, and I think those apply to me much more than the more heady, abstractly-indulgent idea they have of ENFPs. There's also that whole thing where their ENFPs tend to be more serious about causes or things they believe in (revolutionary Fi politician) while their ESFPs are more fun, harmonious and focused on standing out (unchained Fi fashionista), where I think the latter applies to me a lot more. I think a lot of it depends on what part of me they see, too, but I do think that I as a whole might come up more as an ESFP to them.</p>
Replying to post #1268 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/17 (Sun) 13:11:18 #1260
	My attitude towards trying to look at people for who they really are instead of as made up archetypes in my head that tear away from the reality of who they are shouldn’t be an indicator for Introverted Feeling at all, especially since that attitude can’t take on that self-centeredness Fi is characterized by where your way of looking at people would come only from comparing your own attitude against theirs, which would mean that I couldn’t love and respect others if I couldn’t “see myself in them,” which I don’t relate to in any shape or form. What happened to ESFJ? You made up something about me being duty-fulfilling and hardworking (when I believe both those traits are extremely misrepresentative of who I am) because you wanted to fit me into a stack that had both Fe, Ne and inferior Ti, and ironically you consider yourself Te/Fi, where I would imagine you’d have more an awareness of what should fit people and what shouldn’t based on your own criteria. Even if you were to paint me as an auxiliary Fi user with out-of-touch tertiary Te, I think it’s grossly incorrect to conflate that representation with regard to how I exercise logic using the very basis with which you’re typing me.

Editing post #1260 by strawberry crisis <p>My attitude towards trying to look at people for who they really are instead of as made up archetypes in my head that tear away from the reality of who they are shouldn’t be an indicator for Introverted Feeling at all, especially since that attitude can’t take on that self-centeredness Fi is characterized by where your way of looking at people would come only from comparing your own attitude against theirs, which would mean that I couldn’t love and respect others if I couldn’t “see myself in them,” which I don’t relate to in any shape or form. What happened to ESFJ? You made up something about me being duty-fulfilling and hardworking (when I believe both those traits are extremely misrepresentative of who I am) because you wanted to fit me into a stack that had both Fe, Ne and inferior Ti, and ironically you consider yourself Te/Fi, where I would imagine you’d have more an awareness of what should fit people and what shouldn’t based on your own criteria. Even if you were to paint me as an auxiliary Fi user with out-of-touch tertiary Te, I think it’s grossly incorrect to conflate that representation with regard to how I exercise logic using the very basis with which you’re typing me.</p>
Replying to post #1260 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/03 (Sun) 14:44:57 #954
	Oh, that’s right. I tried to be more conscientious and picked up a lot of “J” traits with regards to my work but at best I’d only ever been a conscientious perceiver. Most online MBTI tests would give me a weak J result but had I taken Form M back then, I wouldn’t have scored anywhere close to J. I realized that whatever I scored J in on the spinoff online tests weren’t really linked to J as much as they were to having decent work ethics. But even that never stuck and I dropped my conscientious side within a couple of weeks, so I wouldn’t score J anywhere anymore even if I tried pushing it as much as I did then.

Editing post #954 by strawberry crisis <p>Oh, that’s right. I tried to be more conscientious and picked up a lot of “J” traits with regards to my work but at best I’d only ever been a conscientious perceiver. Most online MBTI tests would give me a weak J result but had I taken Form M back then, I wouldn’t have scored anywhere close to J. I realized that whatever I scored J in on the spinoff online tests weren’t really linked to J as much as they were to having decent work ethics. But even that never stuck and I dropped my conscientious side within a couple of weeks, so I wouldn’t score J anywhere anymore even if I tried pushing it as much as I did then. </p>
Replying to post #954 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/03 (Sun) 14:09:19 #949
	Doha, I'm not sure why you're attempting to ridicule people by pointing out (false) things that don't matter to them. I'm concerned that someone is shadily making alts to try and put others down, not that I'm being "trolled" by others, whatever that means to you. I don't feel very trolled. I'm only very firmly an ENP and a 7 (though I'm now convinced I'm wing 6), so I wouldn't fully commit to T or F unless I ever were to show a hard preference for either. If that "2w3 alt" you're talking about is hanya fenella rosa mozzarella, it was my first account on mbtibase and I'd only ever typed as 7w6 or 7 on it. Nyx, that's actually a super cool observation hahaha. I think we'd normally attribute that to an 8 wing but it's so hard to accurately attribute the wings (6/8) to attitudes especially when most of their traits wouldn't show very explicitly over a medium like this.

Editing post #949 by strawberry crisis <p>Doha, I'm not sure why you're attempting to ridicule people by pointing out (false) things that don't matter to them. I'm concerned that someone is shadily making alts to try and put others down, not that I'm being "trolled" by others, whatever that means to you. I don't feel very trolled. I'm only very firmly an ENP and a 7 (though I'm now convinced I'm wing 6), so I wouldn't fully commit to T or F unless I ever were to show a hard preference for either. If that "2w3 alt" you're talking about is hanya fenella rosa mozzarella, it was my first account on mbtibase and I'd only ever typed as 7w6 or 7 on it.</p> <p> </p> <p>Nyx, that's actually a super cool observation hahaha. I think we'd normally attribute that to an 8 wing but it's so hard to accurately attribute the wings (6/8) to attitudes especially when most of their traits wouldn't show very explicitly over a medium like this.</p>
Replying to post #949 by strawberry crisis

Lily Ives Gossamer 2018/06/03 (Sun) 09:07:42 #926
@Teru now plz don't go around chinwagging here you idiot, as far as I can remember you used to troll strawberry. And btw strawberry I dont see any reason why you'd take tiger's side she trolled you too right? your whole website once before? So you went from an ENFP 7w6 to ENTP 7w8 to again back at ENFP 7w6, and made an alt which was 2w3. You yourself don't know your type how the hell are you supposed to do the thing I presume the only one thing you're good at? The way I see it you're trolling everyone here too.

Editing post #926 by Lily Ives Gossamer <p>@Teru now plz don't go around chinwagging here you idiot, as far as I can remember you used to troll strawberry. And btw strawberry I dont see any reason why you'd take tiger's side she trolled you too right? your whole website once before? So you went from an ENFP 7w6 to ENTP 7w8 to again back at ENFP 7w6, and made an alt which was 2w3. You yourself don't know your type how the hell are you supposed to do the thing I presume the only one thing you're good at? The way I see it you're trolling everyone here too. </p>
Replying to post #926 by Lily Ives Gossamer

Nyx INTP 5w4 593 Sx/Sp 2018/06/02 (Sat) 12:44:16 #915
I've always seen the w6 and w8 for a 7 to both provide the “I want to be there for them” drive but having that come from filling it with different roles. It really is hard to wrap my head around the idea of a 6 not really motivated by fear, which is why it is also easy to label you as an 8, not only due to lack of being motivated by anxiety but also coming from a self-sufficient and proactive standpoint. When you deliver your argument for things, it always seemed to have this "I've done the percieving for you, so you can rest assured that this is correct" kind of approach to it (in my opinion), which I could never tell if it seemed more 8 or that floaty kind of 6. But hearing all of this from your point of view it really does tip the balance in favor of being a 6 than 8 or balanced wings.

Editing post #915 by Nyx <p>I've always seen the w6 and w8 for a 7 to both provide the “I want to be there for them” drive but having that come from filling it with different roles. It really is hard to wrap my head around the idea of a 6 not really motivated by fear, which is why it is also easy to label you as an 8, not only due to lack of being motivated by anxiety but also coming from a self-sufficient and proactive standpoint. When you deliver your argument for things, it always seemed to have this "I've done the percieving for you, so you can rest assured that this is correct" kind of approach to it (in my opinion), which I could never tell if it seemed more 8 or that floaty kind of 6. But hearing all of this from your point of view it really does tip the balance in favor of being a 6 than 8 or balanced wings.</p>
Replying to post #915 by Nyx

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/02 (Sat) 01:35:09 #908
	This may be a very unsatisfying answer, but there’s almost a magical distinction you have to make in the Enneagram between “core traits” and “learned traits” where what defined a fear in your early childhood is what dictates how your personality develops as you age, or in other words, isolating traits and observing yourself just based on those alone without connecting them back to how the Enneagram’s fears work would lead to typing in the system based solely around something it attributes to scratching the surface; identifying your type should involve connecting back certain ways you act to one of the central themes that’s outlined in the system. I think it’s very possible to engage in this exercise without having to subscribe to it on a deeper level, but I do admittedly feel myself falling into the everything-confirms-it attitude as I’d once been with The Functions, where I identify with the energy described of the 6 over the 8 and find patterns throughout my life confirming the presence of a 6 side that gets deprioritized over my 7 core rather than one with an 8 side. But just from a more literal perspective, the page szero linked below (http://www.russellrowe.com/enneagram-types/enneagram-type-6-description.pdf) also has a section where it describes the “natural gifts and talents” of the 6, where I do relate just about completely to each one, whereas the same section for the 8 is permeated by a sense of independence that weaves back into its core which I really don’t relate to. It’s not the same kind of independence that comes with 7 but one that’s bent around a very negative everyone-for-themselves worldview where they can only live solitarily in a way that would imply detachedness if assertion weren’t such a part of 8. Another way to look at it is how I relate a lot to the Social-first description of the 6 here: demonstrating care and devotion to social groups, being self-sacrificing, staying connected with others, etc. Normally I would isolate those traits and attribute them to perhaps 2 since I don’t really relate to the authority/anxiety stuff but thinking about it, I never consciously think about why exactly I fulfill social obligations where I’m asked to do something other than perhaps a silent “I want to be there for them” in whatever context that idea manifests in: performing with someone, listening to someone, working for someone, or anything else. I have an awful natural inclination to be extremely self-centered and do things solely for my own enjoyment, and I feel like I have to care for others in order to compensate for that nasty side to me that I never want to show. I think it’s why at home I’m much more unfiltered in my behavior, too—it’s like I flip a switch and can be horrendous because I’m able to forget to care so much more easily. Writing all this out, it makes sense why I would be so out of touch with that anxiety thing. I never really think about the “what if I didn’t?” aspect or act on it... the Enneagram tells me I would probably be much more consciously anxious if I were in touch with that kind of thinking. But all that aside, I’m not sure where I would fit an 8 wing into that same way of looking at myself. I do consider myself self-confident and I’m hard to bring down, but these are traits I feel like I’m pulling out of context for the 8. It’s like how I can be very assertive and I do a lot of mean goofs, but it hardly makes me more 8 than 6. And even with that mean jokester thing in mind, there’s a “presentable” me I’m able to revert back to that eases others whenever I go too far with something by accident—maybe that can also be attached to the 6 wing? That kind of thinking is exactly what I mean with an everything-confirms-it attitude, where I’m able to connect everything back to the 6 wing all of a sudden, but is it just me locking myself into that kind of thinking? The RHETI gave me 8 as my third highest score after 7 and 2, and 6 was by far my lowest, but here I am thinking 7 pairs with 6 for me rather than 8. I think this is just the way the Enneagram works, like how I could look back at a version of myself that I could consider nearly the exact opposite of who I am now and still type it 7 because of its links to 1 and 5.

Editing post #908 by strawberry crisis <p>This may be a very unsatisfying answer, but there’s almost a magical distinction you have to make in the Enneagram between “core traits” and “learned traits” where what defined a fear in your early childhood is what dictates how your personality develops as you age, or in other words, isolating traits and observing yourself just based on those alone without connecting them back to how the Enneagram’s fears work would lead to typing in the system based solely around something it attributes to scratching the surface; identifying your type should involve connecting back certain ways you act to one of the central themes that’s outlined in the system. I think it’s very possible to engage in this exercise without having to subscribe to it on a deeper level, but I do admittedly feel myself falling into the everything-confirms-it attitude as I’d once been with The Functions, where I identify with the energy described of the 6 over the 8 and find patterns throughout my life confirming the presence of a 6 side that gets deprioritized over my 7 core rather than one with an 8 side. </p> <p> </p> <p>But just from a more literal perspective, the page szero linked below (<a href="http://www.russellrowe.com/enneagram-types/enneagram-type-6-description.pdf">http://www.russellrowe.com/enneagram-types/enneagram-type-6-description.pdf</a>) also has a section where it describes the “natural gifts and talents” of the 6, where I do relate just about completely to each one, whereas the same section for the 8 is permeated by a sense of independence that weaves back into its core which I really don’t relate to. It’s not the same kind of independence that comes with 7 but one that’s bent around a very negative everyone-for-themselves worldview where they can only live solitarily in a way that would imply detachedness if assertion weren’t such a part of 8. Another way to look at it is how I relate a lot to the Social-first description of the 6 here: demonstrating care and devotion to social groups, being self-sacrificing, staying connected with others, etc. Normally I would isolate those traits and attribute them to perhaps 2 since I don’t really relate to the authority/anxiety stuff but thinking about it, I never consciously think about why exactly I fulfill social obligations where I’m asked to do something other than perhaps a silent “I want to be there for them” in whatever context that idea manifests in: performing with someone, listening to someone, working for someone, or anything else. I have an awful natural inclination to be extremely self-centered and do things solely for my own enjoyment, and I feel like I have to care for others in order to compensate for that nasty side to me that I never want to show. I think it’s why at home I’m much more unfiltered in my behavior, too—it’s like I flip a switch and can be horrendous because I’m able to forget to care so much more easily.</p> <p> </p> <p>Writing all this out, it makes sense why I would be so out of touch with that anxiety thing. I never really think about the “what if I didn’t?” aspect or act on it... the Enneagram tells me I would probably be much more consciously anxious if I were in touch with that kind of thinking. But all that aside, I’m not sure where I would fit an 8 wing into that same way of looking at myself. I do consider myself self-confident and I’m hard to bring down, but these are traits I feel like I’m pulling out of context for the 8. It’s like how I can be very assertive and I do a lot of mean goofs, but it hardly makes me more 8 than 6. And even with that mean jokester thing in mind, there’s a “presentable” me I’m able to revert back to that eases others whenever I go too far with something by accident—maybe that can also be attached to the 6 wing? That kind of thinking is exactly what I mean with an everything-confirms-it attitude, where I’m able to connect everything back to the 6 wing all of a sudden, but is it just me locking myself into that kind of thinking?</p> <p> </p> <p>The RHETI gave me 8 as my third highest score after 7 and 2, and 6 was by far my lowest, but here I am thinking 7 pairs with 6 for me rather than 8. I think this is just the way the Enneagram works, like how I could look back at a version of myself that I could consider nearly the exact opposite of who I am now and still type it 7 because of its links to 1 and 5.</p>
Replying to post #908 by strawberry crisis

Nyx INTP 5w4 593 Sx/Sp 2018/06/01 (Fri) 16:21:57 #902
I'm interested in hearing more about the traits you share with the 6 wing or what you believe distances yourself from 8. People like myself don't get a very full picture of you over the internet, especially in the case of seeing influences of your wing or wings (Like you said, "Invisible 6 traits"), i.e. just complete the thought, if we would agree that you're honest, direct, straightforward, and these do not make its way into what you type as what does in your point of view? I don't really know how to put this, but when I read your responses it seemed to come from a "defeating arguments against" and as you seem thoroughly convinced I would like to be as well.

Editing post #902 by Nyx <p>I'm interested in hearing more about the traits you share with the 6 wing or what you believe distances yourself from 8. People like myself don't get a very full picture of you over the internet, especially in the case of seeing influences of your wing or wings (Like you said, "Invisible 6 traits"), i.e. just complete the thought, if we would agree that you're honest, direct, straightforward, and these do not make its way into what you type as what does in your point of view? <br /> <br /> I don't really know how to put this, but when I read your responses it seemed to come from a "defeating arguments against" and as you seem thoroughly convinced I would like to be as well.</p>
Replying to post #902 by Nyx

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/06/01 (Fri) 11:35:04 #898
	Oh yeah, I guess I totally forgot to ban your main account yesterday after you started posting all that nonsense on “Hanya fenella Rosa mozzarella.” Is this all you wanted to say? This reads like a kindergartener rehearsing his speech to the class bully in front of the mirror. I don’t really know what you got out of trying to harass Oxytocin and Tiger on their entries but I’m not here to aid you on your quest to “destroy” typology or whatever it is you’re trying to do. Go find somewhere else to do your thing because I’m bored of your antics here and it’s not really doing anything for you. I went ahead and banned you on “Doha,” “Claudespeed3,” “mike dike,” “Joc,” “Baros,” “Aluminium Frost,” “remember what your fart is for,” and whatever else I banned already that I’m too lazy to look back for. And since I never replied to your previous comment: the way I was raised should probably have indicated that I turn out to be a 6, even though I responded to it in a way that would move me toward 7 instead. Whether I’ll grow up to be a 7w8 is ambiguous but from the Enneagram’s perspective, I think I should be a 7w6 as-is with “invisible” 6 traits. I can be honest, direct, straightforward and all of that but unless I’m mistaken, it doesn’t make its way into whatever I can type as.

Editing post #898 by strawberry crisis <p>Oh yeah, I guess I totally forgot to ban your main account yesterday after you started posting all that nonsense on “Hanya fenella Rosa mozzarella.” Is this all you wanted to say? This reads like a kindergartener rehearsing his speech to the class bully in front of the mirror. I don’t really know what you got out of trying to harass Oxytocin and Tiger on their entries but I’m not here to aid you on your quest to “destroy” typology or whatever it is you’re trying to do. Go find somewhere else to do your thing because I’m bored of your antics here and it’s not really doing anything for you.</p> <p> </p> <p>I went ahead and banned you on “Doha,” “Claudespeed3,” “mike dike,” “Joc,” “Baros,” “Aluminium Frost,” “remember what your fart is for,” and whatever else I banned already that I’m too lazy to look back for.</p> <p> </p> <p>And since I never replied to your previous comment: the way I was raised should probably have indicated that I turn out to be a 6, even though I responded to it in a way that would move me toward 7 instead. Whether I’ll grow up to be a 7w8 is ambiguous but from the Enneagram’s perspective, I think I should be a 7w6 as-is with “invisible” 6 traits. I can be honest, direct, straightforward and all of that but unless I’m mistaken, it doesn’t make its way into whatever I can type as.</p>
Replying to post #898 by strawberry crisis

Doha INTJ 6w5 2018/05/29 (Tue) 12:08:46 #827
Hmm... You do seem a little bold from that alone episode. Also I can see you're a bit assertive and a little no nonsense kinda, which resembles an 8 wing. It could be that once you reach your adulthood you're 8 wing would be very overt. Since enneagram is all about childhood defense mechanism which is the core of the whole theory, you're still a couple of years away until you can completely mold yourself into a full 7w8. And by that Naive optimism thing of the 7w6 i talked about was in reference to how most of the progressive events in the history are associated with the 7w6s like the hippie movement, new age movement, legalization etc etc. So i labelled them as naive optimists, but your reasoning seems very apt about how the 6 wing can manifest in a street smart way around. Also your thesises and reasoning indicates Ti dom and if you're Ne is high too, then you could be an ENTP? Anyways I'm changing your vote from 3w2 to 7w8, you're now officially a part of the mean troll club Lol.

Editing post #827 by Doha <p>Hmm... You do seem a little bold from that alone episode. Also I can see you're a bit assertive and a little no nonsense kinda, which resembles an 8 wing. It could be that once you reach your adulthood you're 8 wing would be very overt. Since enneagram is all about childhood defense mechanism which is the core of the whole theory, you're still a couple of years away until you can completely mold yourself into a full 7w8. And by that Naive optimism thing of the 7w6 i talked about was in reference to how most of the progressive events in the history are associated with the 7w6s like the hippie movement, new age movement, legalization etc etc. So i labelled them as naive optimists, but your reasoning seems very apt about how the 6 wing can manifest in a street smart way around. Also your thesises and reasoning indicates Ti dom and if you're Ne is high too, then you could be an ENTP?</p> <p>Anyways I'm changing your vote from 3w2 to 7w8, you're now officially a part of the mean troll club Lol.</p>
Replying to post #827 by Doha

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/05/27 (Sun) 13:11:00 #789
	“Just imagine yourself if you're left alone in the world, how would you behave?” I’ve been there and what proved arruinous for me was my poor sense of self-preservation, even though I was very okay with that myself—others were horrified learning about my extremely perceiverish attitude living alone and I don’t think anything really describes it too well other than “lack of sp.” This may mean that I’m implicitly dependent on support but I myself turn a blind eye to it. It turns out that I’m perfectly okay with that type of support disappearing, but I don’t really do “well” without it. Maybe a better connection to draw might be to not having people to talk to or spending time completely alone? The problem with how you related it back to self-support in the Eight wing example is that it turned into a dichotomy where I wouldn’t necessarily fit in either. I wonder though about the blind optimism thing... is that really a 7w6 thing? It seems like a Seven thing but Six is both realistic and logical so I wouldn’t imagine how naïveté translates to a Six wing as much as it might to “not an Eight wing,” which places a lot more emphasis on a negative view of the world where it’s more subconscious for the Six. The distractability thing is also just a Seven thing as far as I know rather than a 7w6 thing and it’s how Sevens tend to be unaware of how their anxiety shows (I’ve read it’s anxiety that comes from the inner world, too, hence why Sevens distract themselves through external means) but something interesting is that Sixes are described as “out of touch with their thinking” which might translate to a sense of unawareness of their anxiety if that idea builds context outside of having to seek assurance in their thoughts from other people. I don’t know if I would call 7w8 more “street-smart” as much as “self-reliant.” I think 7w6s are by nature much more street-smart considering that the Six wing would make them much more aware of other people and the environment built around them. I wonder how it would compare to Eight’s awareness of who has the resources, though. I recognize how I should be a 7w6 but my behavior isn’t straightforwardly 6 sp enough for me to be able to connect how Sixes are often described back to myself.

Editing post #789 by strawberry crisis <p>“Just imagine yourself if you're left alone in the world, how would you behave?”</p> <p> </p> <p>I’ve been there and what proved arruinous for me was my poor sense of self-preservation, even though I was very okay with that myself—others were horrified learning about my extremely perceiverish attitude living alone and I don’t think anything really describes it too well other than “lack of sp.” This may mean that I’m implicitly dependent on support but I myself turn a blind eye to it. It turns out that I’m perfectly okay with that type of support disappearing, but I don’t really do “well” without it. Maybe a better connection to draw might be to not having people to talk to or spending time completely alone? The problem with how you related it back to self-support in the Eight wing example is that it turned into a dichotomy where I wouldn’t necessarily fit in either. </p> <p> </p> <p>I wonder though about the blind optimism thing... is that really a 7w6 thing? It seems like a Seven thing but Six is both realistic and logical so I wouldn’t imagine how naïveté translates to a Six wing as much as it might to “not an Eight wing,” which places a lot more emphasis on a negative view of the world where it’s more subconscious for the Six. The distractability thing is also just a Seven thing as far as I know rather than a 7w6 thing and it’s how Sevens tend to be unaware of how their anxiety shows (I’ve read it’s anxiety that comes from the inner world, too, hence why Sevens distract themselves through external means) but something interesting is that Sixes are described as “out of touch with their thinking” which might translate to a sense of unawareness of their anxiety if that idea builds context outside of having to seek assurance in their thoughts from other people. I don’t know if I would call 7w8 more “street-smart” as much as “self-reliant.” I think 7w6s are by nature much more street-smart considering that the Six wing would make them much more aware of other people and the environment built around them. I wonder how it would compare to Eight’s awareness of who has the resources, though. I recognize how I should be a 7w6 but my behavior isn’t straightforwardly 6 sp enough for me to be able to connect how Sixes are often described back to myself.</p>
Replying to post #789 by strawberry crisis

Doha INTJ 6w5 2018/05/27 (Sun) 07:45:25 #788
Also 7w8s are much more grounded in reality vs 7w6. The blind optimism about the future and in themselves in a naive way is a 7w6 thing. 7w6s do feel anxious but they quell their insecurity well by distracting themselves making them less aware of their anxiety, they're also more social than the other subtype coz the social role of them being an entertainer or a joker in most cases is intended to build social alliances which they identify with their guidance system support of a 6 wing. 7w8s are more street smart and the 8 wing makes them more independent. Neither type focuses primarily on security and there's often a noticeable difference between a 6w7 and a 7w6 in that their wings have almost diminishing impact on their everyday life enough to identify with.

Editing post #788 by Doha <p>Also 7w8s are much more grounded in reality vs 7w6. The blind optimism about the future and in themselves in a naive way is a 7w6 thing. 7w6s do feel anxious but they quell their insecurity well by distracting themselves making them less aware of their anxiety, they're also more social than the other subtype coz the social role of them being an entertainer or a joker in most cases is intended to build social alliances which they identify with their guidance system support of a 6 wing. 7w8s are more street smart and the 8 wing makes them more independent. Neither type focuses primarily on security and there's often a noticeable difference between a 6w7 and a 7w6 in that their wings have almost diminishing impact on their everyday life enough to identify with.</p>
Replying to post #788 by Doha

Doha INTJ 6w5 2018/05/27 (Sun) 06:55:18 #786
But there's also this thing where 7w6 wants all the pleasures of life with minimal pain and they're the most pain avoiding type. 7w6s do take life and foundation for granted if they're provided for already. Since you're living with parents you wouldn't know about your concern for security. Just imagine yourself if you're left alone in the world, how would you behave? 7w8s are true daredevils in that they don't care about what's gonna happen tomorrow, their motto is simple "live life as if you're gonna die tomorrow" so they don't care about any outcome in most cases. Which fictional character you relate more with? Michael Scott from the office VS max from 2 broke girls? And also your focus towards your work has got more to do with a 7s integration to 5 than with a type 8.

Editing post #786 by Doha <p>But there's also this thing where 7w6 wants all the pleasures of life with minimal pain and they're the most pain avoiding type. 7w6s do take life and foundation for granted if they're provided for already. Since you're living with parents you wouldn't know about your concern for security. Just imagine yourself if you're left alone in the world, how would you behave? 7w8s are true daredevils in that they don't care about what's gonna happen tomorrow, their motto is simple "live life as if you're gonna die tomorrow" so they don't care about any outcome in most cases. Which fictional character you relate more with? Michael Scott from the office VS max from 2 broke girls? And also your focus towards your work has got more to do with a 7s integration to 5 than with a type 8.</p>
Replying to post #786 by Doha

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/05/26 (Sat) 20:15:29 #779
	Ohmygodyikes I wrote out a huge huge thing and I can't believe it's all gone now but yes aaaah all this can go really really deep and it makes sense that with someone who is sp-blind, Seven core, and extremely not-SJ that a Six wing would get greatly obscured. 7w6 so/sx may be the most boring and stereotypical pairing to ENFP but 7w6 so/sx as a type might be the most fascinating and contradictory pairing that exists in the Enneagram and hence why I think maybe a lot of 7w6s may also appear to be "wingless." The Riso/Hudson book I read and the test I took that convinced me I just could not be a Six wing no matter what painted a picture of the Six as extremely sp/ISTJ and it was incredibly unrelatable while I could match traits of the Eight back to me, but reading Russell Rowe's description of the Six makes me almost think I could be 6w7 so/sx… save for the overt conscious doubt and anxiety. It makes sense that something like that would be extremely repressed in an ENFP 7 who is sp-blind, since Seven tends to contradict SIx and Seven is what defines my core. But I could connect so many traits from the much more EF Six to myself if I erase the things that Seven would overwrite (optimism/anxiety, anti-authority/authority-chained) that it makes too much sense that I would be a 7w6 with a very repressed Six side. Also I learned in all this that Six is actually a very wonderful and versatile and chameleonic type and much better than Eight which is solitary and terrible so I love 6w7s now they're my second favoritest

Editing post #779 by strawberry crisis <p>Ohmygodyikes I wrote out a huge huge thing and I can't believe it's all gone now but yes aaaah all this can go really really deep and it makes sense that with someone who is sp-blind, Seven core, and extremely not-SJ that a Six wing would get greatly obscured. 7w6 so/sx may be the most boring and stereotypical pairing to ENFP but 7w6 so/sx as a type might be the most fascinating and contradictory pairing that exists in the Enneagram and hence why I think maybe a lot of 7w6s may also appear to be "wingless." The Riso/Hudson book I read and the test I took that convinced me I just could not be a Six wing no matter what painted a picture of the Six as extremely sp/ISTJ and it was incredibly unrelatable while I could match traits of the Eight back to me, but reading Russell Rowe's description of the Six makes me almost think I could be 6w7 so/sx… save for the overt conscious doubt and anxiety. It makes sense that something like that would be extremely repressed in an ENFP 7 who is sp-blind, since Seven tends to contradict SIx and Seven is what defines my core. But I could connect so many traits from the much more EF Six to myself if I erase the things that Seven would overwrite (optimism/anxiety, anti-authority/authority-chained) that it makes too much sense that I would be a 7w6 with a very repressed Six side. Also I learned in all this that Six is actually a very wonderful and versatile and chameleonic type and much better than Eight which is solitary and terrible so I love 6w7s now they're my second favoritest</p>
Replying to post #779 by strawberry crisis

	szero INTJ 1w9 Sp/Sx LII-Ti 2018/05/26 (Sat) 17:01:23 #776
	A briefing: I stumbled upon this page yesterday and while I still haven't figured out why people would vote strawberry as wing 8, I decided to actually go and talk to her and show a description which I think is a good fit, the link to which will be at the end of this comment. She said she related to it to the point of even being able to see herself as 6w7, so there you go. As for what she's commented on about the wing, I do think that's how it's supposed to work (assuming I understood it correctly) - your wing's motivation does blend in with the core type. I, for example, like being at peace just like other 9s but I'm not willing to do so with someone who attacks my 1 values without reason. As for the "security" stuff, that's a Self-Preservation 6 thing. I suppose a better way to link all 6 types is to say they all want to be able to commit unconditionally to something (their alliances, strength/beauty or a cause), and so they find themselves at varying levels of doubt (the least doubt being found when their link to 9 is strongest). This will manifest differently depending on your adjacent Enneagram types and MBTI letters, of course. http://www.russellrowe.com/enneagram-types/enneagram-type-6-description.pdf

Editing post #776 by szero <p>A briefing: I stumbled upon this page yesterday and while I still haven't figured out why people would vote strawberry as wing 8, I decided to actually go and talk to her and show a description which I think is a good fit, the link to which will be at the end of this comment. She said she related to it to the point of even being able to see herself as 6w7, so there you go. As for what she's commented on about the wing, I do think that's how it's supposed to work (assuming I understood it correctly) - your wing's motivation does blend in with the core type. I, for example, like being at peace just like other 9s but I'm not willing to do so with someone who attacks my 1 values without reason. As for the "security" stuff, that's a Self-Preservation 6 thing. I suppose a better way to link all 6 types is to say they all want to be able to commit unconditionally to something (their alliances, strength/beauty or a cause), and so they find themselves at varying levels of doubt (the least doubt being found when their link to 9 is strongest). This will manifest differently depending on your adjacent Enneagram types and MBTI letters, of course.</p> <p>http://www.russellrowe.com/enneagram-types/enneagram-type-6-description.pdf</p>
Replying to post #776 by szero

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018/05/17 (Thu) 00:54:55 #572
	I read a bit of material and I’ve realized a lot about myself over the past few days enough to confidently say that I’m... definitely not a 6 wing, gosh. It actually feels much more wrong to associate myself with a 6 wing than an 8 wing despite everything that the 8 wing stands for. The only way I could twist type 6 around myself is by asserting that I find security and support in adhering to my seven-aligned worldview, but if you were to strip away that sense of “naturalization” from that statement to remove the sevenness from it (the anxiety angle with security turns it just into seven) to make it 6 [wing 7] it removes any sense of compatibility with who I really am and how I operate. I actually honestly think type 6 and the traits that stem out of it might be the closest thing to a “blind spot” I have in the Enneagram—those who know me personally constantly try to drill the idea of establishing a sense of security and support in myself and I’m absolutely unable to do that. My family members feel distant from me while I feel micromanaged, and while that idea is very 7 in itself (I realized that there was a way to fit the 5 angle into all that, but there it seems like ambivalence precedes individuality and that this is more seven-aligned after all), I can’t figure out a way to fit myself voluntarily moving toward security and support in it all. I can easily fit “fear of deprivation” into how I act with how I sort of dissociate myself from what I am provided with and move away from familial constraints in order to move toward what I really desire (and feel deprived from without), or in other words, I take my foundation for granted. I think that being wary of that foundation is exactly what should make one identify more with type 6 and it’s something that I can only very barely grasp, and only from an outside perspective. But the problem is that being not a 6 wing is supposed to make you an 8 wing, so i looked into all that too. Type 8 is also far removed from who I am save for the aggressiveness and the healthy traits that arise from its core (but the core is what matters, and I only somewhat relate to it). I’ve only very recently realized that by being security and support-blind, I would have to be less ambivalent to self-reliance... and I do think I have much more of that than I do a need to depend on others for support. I thought I was apathetic to being self-driven, but... not really. But it only truly matters if my sense of self-reliance and inner drive is related to that of type 8, and I think it actually does! Something I really relate to with type 7 is that I very much hate doing things that I don’t enjoy doing, but type 8 can fit in with the things that I do enjoy doing. Doha’s 3w2 comment down there is sort of indicative of this where I can get very very focused and driven about things I like so long as I perceive a worthwhile end result and push through all the fluff to accomplish a task with sheer force. It’s interesting that the black-and-whiteness of type 8 that I am extremely averse to identifying with actually does show itself here with how I can develop a very “Te” mindset where I focus on results and disregard the process in favor of just knowing for sure that something will come out at the very end. Reading over the parental orientation section for type 8, I realized I apply that “role in life” thing to type 7 and how I feel like those traits I like in myself should be used to provide others with direction (like maybe how I’m almost hopelessly optimistic about things). I’m not sure how well it connects back to 8 since that’s also a very 7 idea in itself but I’m satisfied with all that for a wing. I really don’t identify with anything else in type 8 though and think that it’s still very off and I also hate the nasty and distorted worldview 8s are supposed to have so I’m definitely not going to type myself as 8w7 or anything anytime soon but I think I have just enough 8 to finally decide on it as a wing. I never saw much 8 in myself and identified with the 7w6 archetype sans its dependencies and worry and all of that but realizing how 6-averse I am makes me think that this has to at the very least be more right. But phew now that I’ve finally documented all of that I can’t wait to see how I react to this months later when I type as 7w6 upon realizing I’m brimming with anxiety and define myself thru my relationships with authority figures! And oops is that another strawberry thesis statement

Editing post #572 by strawberry crisis <p>I read a bit of material and I’ve realized a lot about myself over the past few days enough to confidently say that I’m... definitely not a 6 wing, gosh. It actually feels much more wrong to associate myself with a 6 wing than an 8 wing despite everything that the 8 wing stands for. The only way I could twist type 6 around myself is by asserting that I find security and support in adhering to my seven-aligned worldview, but if you were to strip away that sense of “naturalization” from that statement to remove the sevenness from it (the anxiety angle with security turns it just into seven) to make it 6 [wing 7] it removes any sense of compatibility with who I really am and how I operate. </p><br> <p>I actually honestly think type 6 and the traits that stem out of it might be the closest thing to a “blind spot” I have in the Enneagram—those who know me personally constantly try to drill the idea of establishing a sense of security and support in myself and I’m absolutely unable to do that. My family members feel distant from me while I feel micromanaged, and while that idea is very 7 in itself (I realized that there was a way to fit the 5 angle into all that, but there it seems like ambivalence precedes individuality and that this is more seven-aligned after all), I can’t figure out a way to fit myself voluntarily moving toward security and support in it all. I can easily fit “fear of deprivation” into how I act with how I sort of dissociate myself from what I am provided with and move away from familial constraints in order to move toward what I really desire (and feel deprived from without), or in other words, I take my foundation for granted. I think that being wary of that foundation is exactly what should make one identify more with type 6 and it’s something that I can only very barely grasp, and only from an outside perspective.</p><br> <p>But the problem is that being not a 6 wing is supposed to make you an 8 wing, so i looked into all that too. Type 8 is also far removed from who I am save for the aggressiveness and the healthy traits that arise from its core (but the core is what matters, and I only somewhat relate to it). I’ve only very recently realized that by being security and support-blind, I would have to be less ambivalent to self-reliance... and I do think I have much more of that than I do a need to depend on others for support. I <em>thought </em>I was apathetic to being self-driven, but... not really. But it only truly matters if my sense of self-reliance and inner drive is related to that of type 8, and I think it actually does!</p><br> <p>Something I really relate to with type 7 is that I very much hate doing things that I don’t enjoy doing, but type 8 can fit in with the things that I do enjoy doing. Doha’s 3w2 comment down there is sort of indicative of this where I can get very very focused and driven about things I like so long as I perceive a worthwhile end result and push through all the fluff to accomplish a task with sheer force. It’s interesting that the black-and-whiteness of type 8 that I am extremely averse to identifying with actually does show itself here with how I can develop a very “Te” mindset where I focus on results and disregard the process in favor of just knowing for sure that something will come out at the very end.</p><br> <p>Reading over the parental orientation section for type 8, I realized I apply that “role in life” thing to type 7 and how I feel like those traits I like in myself should be used to provide others with direction (like maybe how I’m almost hopelessly optimistic about things). I’m not sure how well it connects back to 8 since that’s also a very 7 idea in itself but I’m satisfied with all that for a wing.</p><br> <p>I really don’t identify with anything else in type 8 though and think that it’s still very off and I also hate the nasty and distorted worldview 8s are supposed to have so I’m definitely not going to type myself as 8w7 or anything anytime soon but I think I have just enough 8 to finally decide on it as a wing. I never saw much 8 in myself and identified with the 7w6 archetype sans its dependencies and worry and all of that but realizing how 6-averse I am makes me think that this has to at the very least be more right.</p><br> <p>But phew now that I’ve finally documented all of that I can’t wait to see how I react to this months later when I type as 7w6 upon realizing I’m brimming with anxiety and define myself thru my relationships with authority figures!</p><br> <p>And oops is that another strawberry thesis statement</p>
Replying to post #572 by strawberry crisis

Doha INTJ 6w5 2018/05/05 (Sat) 08:34:57 #152
She seems 3w2 tbh. She got an even better site than either databank or mbtibase in such a little time. She has put in a lot of hard work and research into it along with the thesis and all the tests they seem very neatly organized. Shows her focus is intense towards her work, unlike a 7. Earlier I might have gone with a 5 but she's an ENFP and social so I'll go with 3w2.

Editing post #152 by Doha She seems 3w2 tbh. She got an even better site than either databank or mbtibase in such a little time. She has put in a lot of hard work and research into it along with the thesis and all the tests they seem very neatly organized. Shows her focus is intense towards her work, unlike a 7. Earlier I might have gone with a 5 but she's an ENFP and social so I'll go with 3w2.
Replying to post #152 by Doha

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	ENTP
24/01/26 00:36	LVNA	ENFP
22/03/27 22:00	GIJOEBusta Cap	ENTP
20/04/08 22:47	zayeh	ENFP
20/02/13 15:08	Thyssen	ENFP
19/09/24 08:07	johncena	ENFP
19/07/25 12:35	Eon	ENFP
20/05/01 16:50	Tman	ENFP
18/12/08 11:43	tch	ENFP
18/06/20 02:00	fg	ENFP
18/06/18 08:02	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys	ENFP
18/06/14 05:53	Teru Mikami	ENFP
18/06/14 05:43	switchblades	ENFP
18/05/26 05:01	szero	ENFP
18/05/15 05:36	~snow~	ENFP
18/05/05 12:32	the heart marksman	ENFP
18/05/05 12:13	CIA	ENFP
18/05/04 05:12	kawaii	ENFP
18/05/04 04:56	Taco110	ENFP

date	username	vote
25/07/27 01:48	nicotineseries	ENFP
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	ENTP
22/03/27 22:00	GIJOEBusta Cap	ENTP
20/10/16 23:23	Flower-like	ENFP
20/06/20 00:06	tch	ENFP
20/04/29 18:10	Tman	ENFP
19/07/25 12:35	Eon	ENTP
18/07/11 03:47	switchblades	ENTP
18/12/03 13:26	Taco110	ENTP
18/08/09 18:55	LVNA	ENTP
18/06/17 02:36	Teru Mikami	ENTP
18/08/29 04:02	fg	ENFP
18/06/17 05:29	Stephen Hearts	ENTP
18/05/05 10:43	Tiger	ENFP

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	7w6
22/03/27 22:00	GIJOEBusta Cap	7w6
20/05/07 10:19	Diobono	7w8
19/10/23 01:06	strawberry crisis	7w8
19/09/24 07:27	johncena	cp6w7
19/02/26 18:38	bloomer	6w7
18/06/14 05:53	Teru Mikami	7w6
18/05/26 05:01	szero	7w6
19/10/29 17:08	LVNA	7w8
18/05/13 03:04	fg	7w6
18/06/02 10:42	Nyx	7w6
18/05/05 10:43	Tiger	7w6
18/05/29 12:09	Doha	7w8
18/05/05 12:32	the heart marksman	7w8
18/05/05 12:13	CIA	7w6
18/05/04 08:08	SigmaEnigma	7w6
18/12/03 13:25	Taco110	7w6

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	so/sx
22/03/27 22:00	GIJOEBusta Cap	so/sx
19/03/31 11:06	kawaii	so/sx
24/01/26 00:36	LVNA	so/sx
18/06/01 04:22	Nyx	so/sx
18/05/26 05:01	szero	so/sx
18/05/04 04:56	Taco110	so/sx

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	721
18/12/13 14:19	Taco110	729
18/09/14 05:42	fg	279
18/09/14 18:58	switchblades	729
18/09/13 06:57	Teru Mikami	278
18/09/13 22:19	strawberry crisis	729

date	username	vote
25/07/24 22:56	nicotineseries	IEE
25/07/24 16:11	Woll Smoth	IEE
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	ILE
22/03/27 22:00	GIJOEBusta Cap	IEE
20/10/24 09:59	Flower-like	IEE
19/12/27 19:19	Tiger	IEE
19/12/09 18:09	Tman	IEE
18/12/13 14:19	Taco110	IEE
18/12/03 13:29	switchblades	IEE
18/10/10 01:56	forestgump	ILI
19/12/31 08:02	fg	IEE
18/05/14 01:27	LVNA	IEE

date	username	vote
24/02/12 01:38	fleetingpetals1	VLFE
24/01/26 00:36	LVNA	EVLF
19/12/01 20:19	Tman	EVLF
19/10/19 14:00	fg	EVLF
19/10/15 01:23	strawberry crisis	EVLF

date	username	vote
19/10/16 02:08	strawberry crisis	HEXACO

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:44:53 #8315
	oof!

Editing post #8315 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys oof!
Replying to post #8315 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:44:37 #8314
	This town ain't big enough for the two of us

Editing post #8314 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys This town ain't big enough for the two of us
Replying to post #8314 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:43:29 #8313
	Catch you later alligator

Editing post #8313 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Catch you later alligator
Replying to post #8313 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:43:12 #8312
	See ya later

Editing post #8312 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys See ya later
Replying to post #8312 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:43:01 #8311
	Goodbye

Editing post #8311 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Goodbye
Replying to post #8311 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:42:17 #8310
	Gonna catch the midnight train to Georgia

Editing post #8310 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Gonna catch the midnight train to Georgia
Replying to post #8310 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:41:10 #8309
	Gotta go my own way

Editing post #8309 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Gotta go my own way
Replying to post #8309 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:40:10 #8308
	I must find my own path

Editing post #8308 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys I must find my own path
Replying to post #8308 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:39:34 #8307
	I guess this is the end

Editing post #8307 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys I guess this is the end
Replying to post #8307 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:39:03 #8306
	I wish you well

Editing post #8306 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys I wish you well
Replying to post #8306 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:38:52 #8305
	Until we meet again

Editing post #8305 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Until we meet again
Replying to post #8305 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:38:39 #8304
	Farewell

Editing post #8304 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Farewell
Replying to post #8304 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:38:30 #8303
	so long

Editing post #8303 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys so long
Replying to post #8303 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:38:20 #8302
	i'm gonna make like a banana and split

Editing post #8302 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys i'm gonna make like a banana and split
Replying to post #8302 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:38:00 #8301
	I'm gonna make like a tree and leaf

Editing post #8301 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys I'm gonna make like a tree and leaf
Replying to post #8301 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:37:31 #8300
	See you Space Cowboy

Editing post #8300 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys See you Space Cowboy
Replying to post #8300 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:36:55 #8299
	Adios Amigos

Editing post #8299 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Adios Amigos
Replying to post #8299 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/17 (Wed) 13:16:33 #8298
	Darn, I missed you guys but this site is dead :,(

Editing post #8298 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Darn, I missed you guys but this site is dead :,(
Replying to post #8298 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys INTP 5w4 2020/06/15 (Mon) 20:30:30 #8297
	Are you sticking out your middle finger? Lol

Editing post #8297 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys Are you sticking out your middle finger? Lol
Replying to post #8297 by Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/04/14 (Tue) 01:08:52 #7985
	In response to post #7982. I think instead of two shifting attitudes pulling in opposite directions, it's more like my frame of mind is in a place that relates to both 7 and 8 on a rudimentary basis... like 7 colored in with 8

Editing post #7985 by strawberry crisis I think instead of two shifting attitudes pulling in opposite directions, it's more like my frame of mind is in a place that relates to both 7 and 8 on a rudimentary basis... like 7 colored in with 8
Replying to post #7985 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2020/04/13 (Mon) 19:13:13 #7980
	In response to post #7954. We have themes now!

Editing post #7980 by strawberry crisis We have themes now!
Replying to post #7980 by strawberry crisis

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2020/04/10 (Fri) 01:30:22 #7955
	but however the draw are very well made .

Editing post #7955 by fg but however the draw are very well made .
Replying to post #7955 by fg

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2020/04/10 (Fri) 01:29:10 #7954
	this new interface is very agressive

Editing post #7954 by fg this new interface is very agressive
Replying to post #7954 by fg

	zayeh 2020/04/09 (Thu) 00:00:42 #7910
	does this website have a discord server

Editing post #7910 by zayeh <p>does this website have a discord server</p>
Replying to post #7910 by zayeh

	zayeh 2020/04/08 (Wed) 22:47:08 #7897
	everyone says ENFP so I say ENFP

Editing post #7897 by zayeh <p>everyone says ENFP so I say ENFP</p>
Replying to post #7897 by zayeh

skyvermin 153 1w9 5w6 3w2 so/sx 2019/12/28 (Sat) 18:31:51 #7591
In response to post #7590. Nothing inherently. At least you try to make the appearance of being self-aware, that's more than I can say for some people on this site.

Editing post #7591 by skyvermin <p>Nothing inherently. At least you try to make the appearance of being self-aware, that's more than I can say for some people on this site.</p>
Replying to post #7591 by skyvermin

	Tiger ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/12/28 (Sat) 18:22:14 #7590
	In response to post #7589. True, what's so bad about that?

Editing post #7590 by Tiger <p>True, what's so bad about that?</p>
Replying to post #7590 by Tiger

skyvermin 153 1w9 5w6 3w2 so/sx 2019/12/28 (Sat) 17:32:20 #7589
In response to post #7587. Because she craves attention.

Editing post #7589 by skyvermin <p>Because she craves attention. </p>
Replying to post #7589 by skyvermin

	Tiger ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/12/28 (Sat) 11:38:34 #7588
	In response to post #7587. @Fuzzy 1) I like to keep people on their toes lol 2) I said I'd make a decision by the end of this year, I have 3 days left - I'm experimenting like fuck until that time.

Editing post #7588 by Tiger <p>@Fuzzy</p> <p>1) I like to keep people on their toes lol</p> <p>2) I said I'd make a decision by the end of this year, I have 3 days left - I'm experimenting like fuck until that time.</p>
Replying to post #7588 by Tiger

Fuzzy 2019/12/27 (Fri) 22:26:19 #7587
Why do you keep changing your type tiger?

Editing post #7587 by Fuzzy <p>Why do you keep changing your type tiger?</p>
Replying to post #7587 by Fuzzy

Fuzzy 2019/12/27 (Fri) 22:24:22 #7586
I like your rainbow name this inspires me to set a color for my name.

Editing post #7586 by Fuzzy <p>I like your rainbow name this inspires me to set a color for my name.</p>
Replying to post #7586 by Fuzzy

	Tiger ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/12/27 (Fri) 19:07:35 #7583
	How is strawberry an ENTP? Where's the Ti?

Editing post #7583 by Tiger <p>How is strawberry an ENTP? Where's the Ti?</p>
Replying to post #7583 by Tiger

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/12/01 (Sun) 23:11:13 #7479
	Wow strongest temperament as FP is fascinating I wonder how that happened

Editing post #7479 by strawberry crisis <p>Wow strongest temperament as FP is fascinating I wonder how that happened</p>
Replying to post #7479 by strawberry crisis

	strawberry crisis enfp 7 2019/06/06 (Thu) 17:29:00 #6309
	Thank you!!

Editing post #6309 by strawberry crisis <p>Thank you!!</p>
Replying to post #6309 by strawberry crisis

	switchblades INFP delete 2019/06/05 (Wed) 23:43:08 #6306
	happy birthday

Editing post #6306 by switchblades <p>happy birthday </p>
Replying to post #6306 by switchblades