Anglicanism ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Anglicanism

Religion

in Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

Anglicanism ~ Sakinorva Databank

Anglicanism

Religion

Philosophy, Psychology, and Social Sciences

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

6w5 1

sp/so 1

LSE 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 6

2

1

1

1

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

	Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI 2019/08/15 (Thu) 15:48:59 #6959
	So you bleive not being sexist in you hireing practices is something only emtional people would do? Or were you implying that woman are all more emotional then men, and therefor there leadership will invitibly cause more emtion drivin practics? These are the only two explaintion I can think of, and both are pretty sexist. I apoligize if this was not your saying, but I can't see what else you could mean. As for your other point, clinging to dogma and doctrine isn't ratoinalsim. Thats the oppiste of rationalsim. Rationalsim, involves changing your ideas with the evidnce; for example, we used to the being gay was a mental illnes now we know better. We used to think woman were infiorer to men, now we know beter. And so on and so forth.

Editing post #6959 by Tman <p>So you bleive not being sexist in you hireing practices is something only emtional people would do? Or were you implying that woman are all more emotional then men, and therefor there leadership will invitibly cause more emtion drivin practics? These are the only two explaintion I can think of, and both are pretty sexist. I apoligize if this was not your saying, but I can't see what else you could mean. </p> <p> </p> <p>As for your other point, clinging to dogma and doctrine isn't ratoinalsim. Thats the oppiste of rationalsim. Rationalsim, involves changing your ideas with the evidnce; for example, we used to the being gay was a mental illnes now we know better. We used to think woman were infiorer to men, now we know beter. And so on and so forth. </p>
Replying to post #6959 by Tman

	Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE 2019/08/15 (Thu) 15:35:50 #6958
	Early Anglicanism as expressed by people like Cranmer and Laud is rather rationalistic, whereas now the main Church of England and the Episcopal Church in the US are dominated by sentimentality and a willingness to compromise on pretty much every doctrine. The ordination of women began sporadically in the 70s, which is where this new spirit started as well.

Editing post #6958 by Jacobus <p>Early Anglicanism as expressed by people like Cranmer and Laud is rather rationalistic, whereas now the main Church of England and the Episcopal Church in the US are dominated by sentimentality and a willingness to compromise on pretty much every doctrine. The ordination of women began sporadically in the 70s, which is where this new spirit started as well.</p>
Replying to post #6958 by Jacobus

date	username	vote
19/08/15 15:00	Jacobus	ISFJ
20/02/16 13:13	Tman	ESTJ

date	username	vote
19/08/15 11:34	Tman	6w5

date	username	vote
20/02/16 13:16	Tman	sp/so

date	username	vote
20/02/16 13:14	Tman	631

date	username	vote
20/02/16 13:15	Tman	LSE