Fuzzy ~ Sakinorva Databank

The Sakinorva Databank

Fuzzy

Sakinorva Databank

in Users

Fuzzy ~ Sakinorva Databank

Fuzzy

Sakinorva Databank

Users

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psyche

ISTJ 1

9w8 3

1w2 1

sp/sx 2

LSI 2

SLI 1

VLEF 1

FLEV 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

total votes 22

6

1

4

2

3

2

1

Click to toggle markup guide.

bold	bold
italic	italic
hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"	[hyperlink to "contextualizing functions"](https://sakinorva.net/library/contextualizing_functions)
	(i){https://i.imgur.com/g0oL9CB.png}

You may not modify this entry's picture.

Fuzzy 2020/01/22 (Wed) 04:26:21 #7681
Teru (God): Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, slippery slope, tu quoque, composition/division, bulverism (actually uses it agaisn't me with the gaslighting thing which also has projection in the middle its amazing - this is not a contradiction the argument is not based on projection it's an observation), ad nauseum, false analogy, kafkatrapping, non causae ut causae, moving goalposts, begging the question, red herring, false cause. Based: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, slippery slope, composition/division, bulverism, ad nausem, kafkatrapping, non causae ut causae, moving goalposts, begging the question, red herring, false cause. Artemis: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, tu quoque, composition/division, ad nauseum, non causae ut causae, red herring, false cause. Fuzzy: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, tu quoque, composition/division (kinda), red herring, false cause. To an extent Ally and Thyssen fit the middle ground fallacy but that is just tritype 9, Astro/KispyKreamKatherine was the only case I've seen the fallacy fallacy being used to this day, skyvermin is not active enough for me to include but it would follow the general pattern.

Editing post #7681 by Fuzzy Teru (God): Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, slippery slope, tu quoque, composition/division, bulverism (actually uses it agaisn't me with the gaslighting thing which also has projection in the middle its amazing - this is not a contradiction the argument is not based on projection it's an observation), ad nauseum, false analogy, kafkatrapping, non causae ut causae, moving goalposts, begging the question, red herring, false cause. Based: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, slippery slope, composition/division, bulverism, ad nausem, kafkatrapping, non causae ut causae, moving goalposts, begging the question, red herring, false cause. Artemis: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, tu quoque, composition/division, ad nauseum, non causae ut causae, red herring, false cause. Fuzzy: Ad hominem, poisoning the well, strawman, tu quoque, composition/division (kinda), red herring, false cause. To an extent Ally and Thyssen fit the middle ground fallacy but that is just tritype 9, Astro/KispyKreamKatherine was the only case I've seen the fallacy fallacy being used to this day, skyvermin is not active enough for me to include but it would follow the general pattern.
Replying to post #7681 by Fuzzy

ArtemisFowl01 ENTJ 3w4 LIE 2019/12/27 (Fri) 17:23:45 #7581
In response to post #7572. Fisk, has it ever occured to you that you're entirely concerned with your opinion, and only your opinion? Anything else anyone says is null and void unless it agrees with you. That is beyond degenerate. I seriously hope you can get a mental health check before if you go into this military academy for Brazilians or whatever. The military tends to like people who are willing to listen to what others say. If you keep up with your shitty ass mindset and attitude, you're either going to get your ass kicked by someone a hell of a lot bigger than you, or you'll get fired from your job/kicked out of the military, or whatever shit you plan on doing. TL;DR, I hope you get your ass kicked, faggot.

Editing post #7581 by ArtemisFowl01 <p>Fisk, has it ever occured to you that you're entirely concerned with your opinion, and only your opinion? Anything else anyone says is null and void unless it agrees with you. That is beyond degenerate. I seriously hope you can get a mental health check before if you go into this military academy for Brazilians or whatever. The military tends to like people who are willing to listen to what others say. If you keep up with your shitty ass mindset and attitude, you're either going to get your ass kicked by someone a hell of a lot bigger than you, or you'll get fired from your job/kicked out of the military, or whatever shit you plan on doing. </p> <p>TL;DR, I hope you get your ass kicked, faggot. </p>
Replying to post #7581 by ArtemisFowl01

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/12/27 (Fri) 14:06:50 #7573
	but i already aknowledge the rightness of this argument. i was not even trying to type fuzzy. i even agree that if he use a test as an argument to according value to a self typing he is wrong. but i was just asking you "why do you quote those epistemicologically despicable test on your page despite knowing it is shitty?" i thinked that was what Fuzzy was noticing. you answered to my question in your last paragraph and i am ok with this justification but the whole decomposition and clarification of an argument i already support was quite useless.

Editing post #7573 by fg <p>but i already aknowledge the rightness of this argument. i was not even trying to type fuzzy. i even agree that if he use a test as an argument to according value to a self typing he is wrong. but i was just asking you "why do you quote those epistemicologically despicable test on your page despite knowing it is shitty?" i thinked that was what Fuzzy was noticing. you answered to my question in your last paragraph and i am ok with this justification but the whole decomposition and clarification of an argument i already support was quite useless.</p>
Replying to post #7573 by fg

	fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2019/12/27 (Fri) 09:57:07 #7570
	actually if i understand well what Fuzzy was trying to say, he just show up at least a paradox (paradox as opposite of common sense) or a potential contradiction. He shown that you show your distrust of test (i agree with your argument against test) when typing him and that you still use them (you post your result on your page) . if they are supposed to be an argument for a typing for you as INTJ, 5w6 or whatever you reach to a contradiction because you destroyed yourself the base to support your self-typing. If those post is just an exposition of your result without any epistemical interest about this test and not an argument for self-typing it seem at least quite odd to quote it.

Editing post #7570 by fg <p>actually if i understand well what Fuzzy was trying to say, he just show up at least a paradox (paradox as opposite of common sense) or a potential contradiction. He shown that you show your distrust of test (i agree with your argument against test) when typing him and that you still use them (you post your result on your page) . if they are supposed to be an argument for a typing for you as INTJ, 5w6 or whatever you reach to a contradiction because you destroyed yourself the base to support your self-typing. If those post is just an exposition of your result without any epistemical interest about this test and not an argument for self-typing it seem at least quite odd to quote it.</p>
Replying to post #7570 by fg

date	username	vote
20/05/04 20:05	ftp	INTJ
19/12/26 20:44	Tman	ITP
19/12/24 03:14	skyvermin	ISTP
19/12/23 01:32	ethan	ISTP
19/12/22 17:28	BasedGOD	ISTP
20/04/12 01:37	Thyssen	ISTJ

date	username	vote
20/04/12 01:37	Thyssen	ISTJ

date	username	vote
20/05/09 20:00	Tman	9w8
19/12/24 03:14	skyvermin	9w8
19/12/22 17:28	BasedGOD	9w8
20/04/12 01:33	Thyssen	1w2

date	username	vote
19/12/22 17:28	BasedGOD	sp/sx
19/12/22 16:20	Thyssen	sp/sx

date	username	vote
19/12/23 01:32	ethan	LSI
19/12/22 17:28	BasedGOD	SLI
20/04/12 00:32	Thyssen	LSI

date	username	vote
19/12/22 17:28	BasedGOD	FLEV
20/04/12 01:36	Thyssen	VLEF

date	username	vote
20/04/12 01:34	Thyssen	HEXACO